📧 Communication

court dialogue

Communication Details

From
To
["THE COURT"] ["The Court"]
Date
August 10, 2022
Subject
Admissibility of evidence regarding Mr. Epstein's residence
Message Content

Ms. Menninger argues that a statement in Judge Chin's prior opinion about when Mr. Epstein abandoned a property is not a factual finding and can be disputed, referencing potential testimony that Epstein lived on East 71st Street prior to 1996.

📄 Source Document

DOJ-OGR-00016901.jpg
DOJ Collection
View Document
Document Summary

This document is a court transcript from August 10, 2022, where an attorney, Ms. Menninger, argues that a statement about when Mr. Epstein abandoned a property is not a settled fact. She contends that defense witnesses could have testified that Epstein lived on East 71st Street prior to 1996, contradicting the idea he abandoned it then, and references a prior opinion by Judge Chin to support her argument that the facts are disputable. The transcript ends with the presiding judge asking to see the document under discussion.

Discussion 0

Sign in to join the discussion

No comments yet

Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein communication