The Court and Mr. Weinberg discuss the applicability of the 'Fioro case', Rule 29, the rebuttable presumption for detention, and the different burdens of proof for the 'danger' and 'flight' prongs.
This document is a court transcript from July 24, 2019, capturing a dialogue between an attorney, Mr. Weinberg, and the presiding judge. Mr. Weinberg argues that his client's case is not a typical trafficking case and that the legal presumption for detention is rebuttable. The discussion focuses on the two prongs for rebuttalādanger to the community and flight riskāand the different legal standards of proof required for each.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein communication