After the jury is dismissed for lunch, Ms. Sternheim raises an objection to the Judge regarding a statement made by Ms. Moe in her closing argument. Ms. Sternheim argues that Ms. Moe's claim that a massage table from California affects interstate commerce is inaccurate and not supported by evidence.
This document is a court transcript from a case filed on August 10, 2022. After the jury is dismissed for lunch, an attorney, Ms. Sternheim, raises an objection to the judge concerning a statement made by opposing counsel, Ms. Moe. Ms. Sternheim argues that Ms. Moe's assertion during closing argumentsāthat a massage table originating from California affects interstate commerceāis legally inaccurate and unsupported by evidence presented in the trial.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein communication