📧 Communication

email

Communication Details

From
To
Defense Counsel Defense counsel
Date
August 02, 2019
Subject
RE: motions under seal?
Message Content

Clarifies protective order distinctions between 'sensitive' and non-sensitive discovery. States statements to law enforcement are not sensitive and should be public. Notes Defense violated protective order by publicly filing Exhibits A-D (cell site motion) and will ask Court to remove them.

📄 Source Document

EFTA00021549.pdf
EFTA Collection
View Document
Document Summary

An email chain from August 2, 2019, between Defense Counsel (Garden City, NY) and the US Attorney's Office (SDNY). The discussion concerns the filing of motions related to cell tower data and statements to police. The Defense seeks to file under seal to protect 'cooperating witnesses' and statements, while the Government argues that statements to law enforcement are not 'sensitive' under the protective order. The Government also reprimands the Defense for previously filing sensitive exhibits publicly in error. Additionally, the Defense notes logistical issues with having the defendant sign an affidavit at the MCC without their own team acting as witnesses.

Discussion 0

Sign in to join the discussion

No comments yet

Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein communication