📧 Communication
court testimonyCommunication Details
Mr. Pagliuca questions the witness, Rocchio, about the specific studies and known potential rate of error for the opinions they have provided. The witness explains that there is no single study and that defining a 'pure error rate' is complex in the social sciences, discussing concepts like statistical significance and inter-rater reliability as measures of agreement.
📄 Source Document
This document is a page from a court transcript dated January 15, 2025, detailing the cross-examination of a witness named Rocchio by an attorney, Mr. Pagliuca. The questioning focuses on the scientific basis for Rocchio's expert opinions, specifically the studies relied upon and their potential rate of error. Rocchio states he does not rely on a single study and explains that a 'pure error rate' is not typically calculated in social sciences, instead referencing measures like inter-rater reliability.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein communication