Ms. Moe, representing the government, argues that trial evidence shows the conspiracy was ongoing through 2004 and into 2005. She contends they are relying on evidence that 'exceeds the date in the indictment' but denies it is post-conspiracy evidence.
This document is a court transcript from July 22, 2022, capturing a dialogue between a judge (THE COURT) and a government attorney (MS. MOE). The discussion centers on the legal end date of a conspiracy, with the government arguing it extended through 2004 and into 2005. The judge expresses concern that the evidence cited by the government is 'post conspiracy' because it falls after the date in the indictment and, crucially, after a person named Carolyn turned 18, an event upon which the conspiracy's continuation was legally dependent.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein communication