📧 Communication
courtroom dialogueCommunication Details
From
MR. PAGLIUCA
Linked to MR. PAGLIUCA
To
["THE COURT"]
["The Court"]
Date
August 10, 2022
Subject
Objection during cross-examination
Message Content
Mr. Pagliuca objects to questioning Dr. Loftus about a single study, arguing it's prejudicial and similar to a previous objection the Court sustained when he tried to cross-examine Dr. Rocchio. The Court questions his intent, and he clarifies he was trying to impeach the witness.
📄 Source Document
DOJ-OGR-00016658.jpg
DOJ Collection
Document Summary
This document is a court transcript from August 10, 2022, detailing a sidebar conversation between an attorney, Mr. Pagliuca, and the judge. Mr. Pagliuca objects to the cross-examination of expert witness Dr. Loftus focusing on a single study, arguing it's prejudicial and inconsistent with a prior ruling involving another expert, Dr. Rocchio. The discussion revolves around the proper use of studies to impeach a witness versus introducing affirmative evidence.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein communication