📧 Communication

Letter

Communication Details

From
To
Hon. Alison J. Nathan Hon. Alison J. Nathan
Date
March 09, 2021
Subject
Objection to Proposed Redactions of Government’s Omnibus Response & Exhibit 5
Message Content

Legal arguments opposing government redactions regarding Accuser-2's diary, a redacted accuser's media appearances, and Maxwell's deposition testimony.

📄 Source Document

EFTA00029844.pdf
EFTA Collection
View Document
Document Summary

Defense counsel Laura Menninger objects to government redactions in the case US v. Maxwell. Menninger argues that 'Accuser-2's' diary entries are not confidential as they were shared on a NY Times podcast and do not implicate Maxwell. The letter also argues against redacting information about another accuser (name redacted) who has publicized her allegations via Netflix and podcasts, referencing the 'Kramer notes', and discusses sealing issues related to Maxwell's deposition in a separate civil case ruled on by Judge Preska.

Discussion 0

Sign in to join the discussion

No comments yet

Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein communication