📧 Communication
Courtroom dialogueCommunication Details
From
MS. COMEY
Linked to Ms. Comey
To
THE COURT
THE COURT
Date
August 10, 2022
Subject
Argument regarding paragraph 39 of a complaint
Message Content
Ms. Comey argues that a witness's testimony is consistent with the complaint's timeframe and that it was not legally necessary for the complaint to include every detail of alleged sex acts beyond 'fondling and masturbation'.
📄 Source Document
DOJ-OGR-00013220.jpg
DOJ Collection
Document Summary
This document is a court transcript from a case filed on August 10, 2022, detailing a legal argument between two attorneys, Ms. Comey and Mr. Pagliuca, in front of a judge. The discussion focuses on whether omissions in a legal complaint regarding specific sex acts are inconsistent with a witness's testimony. The judge concludes that the testified detail is significant and sustains an objection related to the matter.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein communication