A note asking a question about flights or evidence, described as 'decidedly ambiguous' by the judge.
This page from a Department of Justice appellate brief argues against Ghislaine Maxwell's appeal regarding jury instructions. The document asserts that Judge Nathan correctly handled an ambiguous jury note concerning flight evidence and 'aiding and abetting' liability. It specifically references testimony by a victim named 'Jane' regarding flights on Epstein's private plane and commercial carriers to New York for the purpose of sexual activity.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein communication