A juror's note written by Catherine Conrad is the subject of a legal argument regarding whether it can be used to infer prejudice in the case. The speaker argues that Rule 606(b) precludes drawing such inferences from the note.
This document is a transcript of a legal argument in court. A lawyer is addressing a judge ('your Honor') about whether a mistake made by a 'Mr. Parse' constituted defrauding the government. The core of the argument revolves around a juror's note written by Catherine Conrad and whether it can be used to infer prejudice, with the lawyer citing Rule 606(b) and a Third Circuit case to argue against its use for that purpose.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein communication