📧 Communication

Oral Argument

← Back to List

Communication Details

From

Narrator Linked to narrator

Chief Justice Warren Burger Chief Justice Warren Burger

Subject

Rebuttal to analogy

Message Content

Argument that the analogy is invalid because bear-baiting hurts animals, unlike the film in question.

📄 Source Document

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017191.jpg

ESTATE Collection

View Document

Document Summary

This document is page 104 of a manuscript (likely by Alan Dershowitz) recounting a Supreme Court oral argument regarding the film 'I Am Curious (Yellow).' The author details a contentious exchange with Chief Justice Warren Burger regarding a 'bear-baiting' analogy, harshly criticizing Burger's intelligence and judicial performance. The text also references the subsequent 'Miller v. California' decision in June 1973.

Discussion 0

No comments yet

Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein communication