📧 Communication

Court proceeding

Communication Details

From
To
Judge Judge
Date
February 22, 2022
Subject
Post-verdict legal argument
Message Content

Mr. Shechtman argues against the government's position that his client, Mr. Parse, benefited from a strategic choice regarding a juror. He contends the acquittal was due to a split verdict caused by a partisan juror who failed to persuade others, not because Mr. Parse benefited from her presence.

📄 Source Document

DOJ-OGR-00010181.jpg
DOJ Collection
View Document
Document Summary

This document is a page from a court transcript dated February 22, 2022. An attorney, Mr. Shechtman, is arguing before a judge, refuting the government's claim that his client, Mr. Parse, benefited from a particular juror. Shechtman contends that the acquittal was the result of a split verdict caused by a single 'partisan' juror who was unable to convince the rest of the jury to convict, and that this outcome was not a benefit derived from her presence.

Discussion 0

Sign in to join the discussion

No comments yet

Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein communication