📧 Communication
Court dialogueCommunication Details
From
Ms. Pomerantz
Linked to MS. POMERANTZ
To
The Court
THE COURT
Date
August 10, 2022
Subject
Scheduling and scope of witness testimony
Message Content
Ms. Pomerantz asked for an estimate on when the next witness would be ready and raised an objection that the current witness, a psychologist, was being cross-examined on matters requiring expert testimony despite being a lay witness.
📄 Source Document
DOJ-OGR-00013717.jpg
DOJ Collection
Document Summary
This document is a court transcript from August 10, 2022, during the cross-examination of witness A. Farmer. Attorney Ms. Pomerantz raises two points with the judge: a scheduling inquiry about the next witness and a legal objection regarding the current witness. She argues that the witness, a psychologist, is being improperly questioned on topics like 'hindsight bias' which require expert testimony, whereas the witness was designated to testify only as a lay witness.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein communication