Closing page of a legal argument regarding sentencing, arguing for context in assessing misconduct and referencing Supreme Court precedent on non-incarcerative sentences.
This document is the final page (page 14) of a legal letter dated March 7, 2013, from attorney Paul Shechtman of Zuckerman Spaeder LLP to Judge William H. Pauley, III. The text concludes an argument regarding sentencing, specifically referencing *Gall v. United States* to argue that non-incarcerative sentences (probation) are still severe and restrictive. The letter is copied to Assistant US Attorneys Stanley J. Okula, Jr. and Nanette Davis.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein communication