Discussion while walking to 52 Duane about whether Juror No. 1 is a suspended lawyer based on voir dire answers and a personal injury suit.
This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE) filed on February 24, 2022. It details the direct examination of a witness by an attorney named Brune. The witness recounts a conversation with Ms. Trzaskoma and Ms. Edelstein while heading to 52 Duane, where they speculated that 'Juror No. 1' might be a suspended lawyer, referencing a personal injury suit in the Bronx and legal concepts like vicarious liability.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein communication