Ms. Pomerantz clarifies their understanding of a question posed to Dr. Rocchio regarding third parties and support in literature, before deferring to the judge's point.
This document is a page from a court transcript dated August 10, 2022. It captures a dialogue between attorneys (Ms. Pomerantz, Mr. Pagliuca) and the judge regarding a question posed to a witness, Dr. Rocchio. The judge clarifies why a specific question about grooming and sexual gratification was objected to and ultimately precluded, citing the narrow basis for excluding testimony on the theory of 'grooming by proxy'.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein communication