A discussion between attorneys and the judge regarding the proper foundation for admitting photographs into evidence. The issue is the lack of a witness (Jane) to testify about them and the significant time lapse (approx. 25 years) between the alleged events and a 2019 search.
This document is a court transcript from August 10, 2022, detailing a legal argument about the admissibility of photographs. The core issue is the lack of a proper foundation for the evidence, as the expected witness, Jane, did not testify, and there is a significant time gap of approximately 25 years between the events she allegedly witnessed (c. 1994-1995) and a 2019 search.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein communication