📧 Communication
court proceedingCommunication Details
From
Ms. Sternheim
Linked to Ms. Sternheim
To
The Court
THE COURT
Date
June 29, 2023
Subject
Sentencing Arguments
Message Content
Argument regarding sentencing guidelines, probation recommendations, and culpability comparison between Maxwell and Epstein.
📄 Source Document
DOJ-OGR-00021626.jpg
DOJ Collection
Document Summary
This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 22-1426) involving the sentencing of Ghislaine Maxwell. Defense attorney Ms. Sternheim argues that the government's requested sentence is excessive and notes that the Probation Department recommended a downward variance to 20 years. Sternheim compares Maxwell to Jeffrey Epstein, arguing that Epstein was 'far more culpable' yet would have faced the same sentencing guidelines.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein communication