The Court questions Mr. Rossmiller why the government is filing a motion on behalf of a third party, represented by the law firm Boies Schiller, instead of Boies Schiller filing the motion themselves. The Court expresses skepticism about the procedure and asserts its judicial authority.
This document is a court transcript from a sealed case, filed on July 2, 2021. In the transcript, the judge questions a government representative, Mr. Rossmiller, about a procedural issue: why the government has filed a motion for relief from a protective order on behalf of a third party, rather than the third party's own law firm, Boies Schiller, filing it. The judge expresses skepticism about this arrangement and asserts their judicial authority, referencing the Martindell case as applicable precedent.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein communication