📧 Communication

courtroom dialogue

← Back to List

Communication Details

From

Unidentified Speaker (likely an attorney), THE COURT, MR. PAGLIUCA Linked to an attorney

["THE COURT", "MR. PAGLIUCA"] ["THE COURT", "MR. PAGLIUCA"]

Date

August 10, 2022

Subject

Admissibility of hearsay evidence in business records

Message Content

A discussion in court regarding the legal standards for admitting hearsay statements found within records like police or hospital reports. The argument is made that such statements are not admissible for the truth of the matter asserted without a foundation of business trustworthiness. The court clarifies they might be admissible for the limited purpose of showing a statement was made on a certain date.

📄 Source Document

DOJ-OGR-00013359.jpg

DOJ Collection

View Document

Document Summary

This document is a court transcript from August 10, 2022, from a direct examination of a witness named Hesse. The transcript captures a legal discussion between an attorney (Mr. Pagliuca) and the judge (The Court) about the admissibility of hearsay evidence, specifically statements contained within business records like police reports. The core issue is that such statements are generally not admissible to prove their content is true unless a specific legal foundation, like business trustworthiness, is established.

Discussion 0

No comments yet

Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein communication