📧 Communication
Direct examination (in court)Communication Details
An attorney questions witness Ms. Conrad about her finances, her memory of the trial and prior court appearances, and her past statements, including her refusal to answer questions about her assets and her statement about retaining herself or her 'convicted felon' husband as a lawyer.
📄 Source Document
This document is a court transcript from February 15, 2012, detailing the direct examination of Ms. Conrad, a former juror in the case against Paul M. Daugerdas. The questioning focuses on her financial situation, her memory of prior court proceedings, and her past confrontational statements to the court, such as calling her husband a "convicted felon" whom she might retain as a lawyer and telling the court that her finances were "none of your business." Ms. Conrad's testimony is evasive and hostile, suggesting a contentious relationship with the court and the defendant's counsel.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein communication