📧 Communication

dissenting opinion

Communication Details

From
To
Unknown
Date
January 01, 2010
Subject
J. Picini Flooring, 356 NLRB No. 9 (2010)
Message Content

The author notes a prior dissenting opinion in this case, where they also disagreed with a requirement for electronic distribution of a notice.

📄 Source Document

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_022313.jpg
ESTATE Collection
View Document
Document Summary

This document is a page from the Federal Register dated August 30, 2011, containing a dissenting opinion regarding a new rule from the National Labor Relations Board (NLRB). The author argues the rule, which compels employers to post notices of employee rights, is a flawed and unauthorized attempt to increase union density. The document also details the Regulatory Flexibility Act analysis, which estimates a minimal compliance cost for businesses, a figure contested by industry commenters. The content of this specific document does not pertain to Jeffrey Epstein or related matters.

Discussion 0

Sign in to join the discussion

No comments yet

Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein communication