📧 Communication

Interviews/Testimony

← Back to List

Communication Details

From

Several witnesses Linked to Several witnesses

OPR (Office of Professional Responsibility) Office of Professional Responsibility

Subject

Interpretation of NPA

Message Content

Witnesses stated they believed the agreement not to prosecute unidentified 'potential co-conspirators' amounted to 'transactional immunity'.

📄 Source Document

DOJ-OGR-00021835.jpg

DOJ Collection

View Document

Document Summary

This is page 11 of a legal filing from November 2024 (Case 22-1426) arguing against a Second Circuit Court decision (U.S. v. Maxwell). The text contends that the court unfairly applied the 'Annabi' precedent to allow the SDNY to prosecute Ghislaine Maxwell despite a Non-Prosecution Agreement (NPA) negotiated in the Eleventh Circuit. The document highlights that witnesses told the OPR the agreement was intended to provide 'transactional immunity' to co-conspirators, yet Maxwell was denied discovery or a hearing on this matter.

Discussion 0

No comments yet

Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein communication