A legal brief is the central topic of discussion. It allegedly omitted a discussion about accessing a suspension opinion and inaccurately claimed an investigation was prompted by Ms. Conrad's letter.
This document is a court transcript from March 24, 2022, detailing the direct examination of a witness named Brune. The questioning focuses on a legal brief, revealing that it omitted key information about a 'suspension opinion' and contained inaccuracies regarding the catalyst for an investigation, which was allegedly a letter from a Ms. Conrad. The transcript suggests that another individual, Ms. Trzaskoma, was responsible for drafting the facts in the brief.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein communication