📧 Communication
Verbal discussionCommunication Details
From
Ms. Trzaskoma
Linked to Ms. Trzaskoma
To
The witness (speaker 'A')
The witness (speaker 'A')
Subject
Potential identity of Juror No. 1
Message Content
Ms. Trzaskoma informed the witness that she recalled a suspended lawyer with the same name as Juror No. 1 and wondered if they were the same person. After reviewing the juror's voir dire responses, she concluded it was unlikely as the responses were inconsistent with being a lawyer.
📄 Source Document
DOJ-OGR-00010069.jpg
DOJ Collection
Document Summary
This document is a page from a legal transcript where a witness is being questioned about a conversation with Ms. Trzaskoma. The discussion focused on whether Juror No. 1 could be the same person as a suspended lawyer named Catherine M. Conrad. The witness testifies that Ms. Trzaskoma, after reviewing the juror's voir dire responses, concluded they were not the same person because the answers were inconsistent with the juror being a lawyer.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein communication