📧 Communication

Floor Statement

Communication Details

From
To
Congress Congress
Date
January 01, 2003
Subject
Retroactivity clause in the PROTECT Act
Message Content

Statement opposing the retroactivity clause due to doubtful constitutionality.

📄 Source Document

DOJ-OGR-00021118.jpg
DOJ Collection
View Document
Document Summary

This document is a page from a legal brief (Case 22-1426) filed on February 28, 2023. It argues against the District Court's reliance on a floor statement by Senator Leahy regarding the PROTECT Act and the constitutionality of retroactive prosecution. The text contends that the court improperly applied the standards of 'Stogner v. California' (2003) to analyze Leahy's remarks, noting that Stogner was decided after the PROTECT Act was passed.

Discussion 0

Sign in to join the discussion

No comments yet

Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein communication