DOJ-OGR-00017317.jpg
620 KB
Extraction Summary
6
People
1
Organizations
1
Locations
3
Events
1
Relationships
2
Quotes
Document Information
Type:
Legal document
File Size:
620 KB
Summary
This document is an excerpt from a legal transcript, dated August 10, 2022, pertaining to Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE. It details a discussion between MR. EVERDELL and MS. MOE, addressing 'Your Honor,' regarding a defendant's alleged role in transporting 'Jane' to and from New Mexico. The central issue is whether these flights were intended for illegal sexual activity and if the defendant's actions constitute aiding and abetting, with the jury currently deliberating on these points for a potential conviction on Count Four.
People (6)
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| MR. EVERDELL | Speaker |
Addressing 'Your Honor' and discussing the case details.
|
| Your Honor | Judge |
Addressed by MR. EVERDELL and MS. MOE during the legal proceeding.
|
| Jane |
A person whose flights and potential engagement in sexual activity are central to the case.
|
|
| defendant | Defendant |
Alleged to have aided in the transportation of Jane's return flight and potentially involved in illegal sexual conduct.
|
| MS. MOE | Speaker |
Addressing 'Your Honor' and providing legal argument regarding jury inference.
|
| jury | Jury |
The body deliberating whether the flight to New Mexico was for the purpose of illegal sexual activity and if intent c...
|
Organizations (1)
| Name | Type | Context |
|---|---|---|
| SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C. | company |
The entity responsible for transcribing the legal proceeding.
|
Timeline (3 events)
Locations (1)
| Location | Context |
|---|---|
|
The destination of a flight and the location where alleged illegal sexual activity may have occurred.
|
Key Quotes (2)
"Your Honor, I think they've been fairly clear. They say: If the defendant aided in the transportation of Jane's return flight, but not the flight to New Mexico. The only evidence we have of a flight to New Mexico with Jane is the one in the flight logs, and it is a flight to New Mexico. And so the return flight would be some other flight besides the flight to New Mexico."Source
— MR. EVERDELL
(Arguing about the distinction between flights and their purpose in relation to the defendant's actions.)
DOJ-OGR-00017317.jpg
Quote #1
"Your Honor, at the very least, the answer to this can't be no, because a jury could infer intent to engage in sexual conduct and the return of a flight in aiding and abetting that."Source
— MS. MOE
(Arguing that a jury could infer intent for aiding and abetting sexual conduct from the return flight.)
DOJ-OGR-00017317.jpg
Quote #2
Full Extracted Text
Complete text extracted from the document (1,595 characters)
Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 773 Filed 08/10/22 Page 13 of 29 3130
LCRVMAXT
1 question because they haven't identified a flight here.
2 MR. EVERDELL: Your Honor, I think they've been fairly
3 clear. They say: If the defendant aided in the transportation
4 of Jane's return flight, but not the flight to New Mexico. The
5 only evidence we have of a flight to New Mexico with Jane is
6 the one in the flight logs, and it is a flight to New Mexico.
7 And so the return flight would be some other flight besides the
8 flight to New Mexico.
9 She is also alleged that -- and to be honest, I think
10 it was a little unclear what may have happened in New Mexico
11 based on her testimony; but if there was any illegal sexual
12 conduct, the flight to New Mexico, this is what they are
13 debating, because they say, but not the flight to New Mexico,
14 where/if the intent was for Jane to engage in sexual activity.
15 Okay. So it seems that the jury is deliberating or at
16 least trying to decide whether the flight to New Mexico was for
17 the purpose of engaging in illegal sexual activity. And they
18 are confused that the return flight that happens after that,
19 could that be the basis alone for a conviction on Count Four.
20 Answer is no, because that return flight is not for the purpose
21 of illegal sexual activity.
22 MS. MOE: Your Honor, at the very least, the answer to
23 this can't be no, because a jury could infer intent to engage
24 in sexual conduct and the return of a flight in aiding and
25 abetting that.
SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.
(212) 805-0300
DOJ-OGR-00017317
LCRVMAXT
1 question because they haven't identified a flight here.
2 MR. EVERDELL: Your Honor, I think they've been fairly
3 clear. They say: If the defendant aided in the transportation
4 of Jane's return flight, but not the flight to New Mexico. The
5 only evidence we have of a flight to New Mexico with Jane is
6 the one in the flight logs, and it is a flight to New Mexico.
7 And so the return flight would be some other flight besides the
8 flight to New Mexico.
9 She is also alleged that -- and to be honest, I think
10 it was a little unclear what may have happened in New Mexico
11 based on her testimony; but if there was any illegal sexual
12 conduct, the flight to New Mexico, this is what they are
13 debating, because they say, but not the flight to New Mexico,
14 where/if the intent was for Jane to engage in sexual activity.
15 Okay. So it seems that the jury is deliberating or at
16 least trying to decide whether the flight to New Mexico was for
17 the purpose of engaging in illegal sexual activity. And they
18 are confused that the return flight that happens after that,
19 could that be the basis alone for a conviction on Count Four.
20 Answer is no, because that return flight is not for the purpose
21 of illegal sexual activity.
22 MS. MOE: Your Honor, at the very least, the answer to
23 this can't be no, because a jury could infer intent to engage
24 in sexual conduct and the return of a flight in aiding and
25 abetting that.
SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.
(212) 805-0300
DOJ-OGR-00017317
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document