HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_015357.jpg
1.24 MB
Extraction Summary
2
People
3
Organizations
2
Locations
0
Events
0
Relationships
4
Quotes
Document Information
Type:
Government exhibit / correspondence fragment
File Size:
1.24 MB
Summary
This document is a page from a House Oversight Committee production (stamped HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_015357). It contains a text fragment, likely from an email exchange or transcript, featuring a disturbing philosophical debate about the ethics and legality of necrophilia, consent, and whether a dead body constitutes private property. The text references the state of California, American individualism, and a comedy routine by Sam Kinison.
People (2)
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Sam Kinison | Comedian / Late Evangelist |
Referenced in the text regarding a comedy routine about necrophilia.
|
| Unidentified Speakers | Participants in dialogue |
Individuals debating the ethics and legality of necrophilia, consent, and property rights.
|
Organizations (3)
| Name | Type | Context |
|---|---|---|
| House Oversight Committee |
Implied by the footer stamp 'HOUSE_OVERSIGHT'.
|
|
| United States of America |
Mentioned in the context of private rights and individualism.
|
|
| State of California |
Mentioned in the context of state laws respecting wishes in a will.
|
Locations (2)
| Location | Context |
|---|---|
|
Mentioned in relation to state laws.
|
|
|
Mentioned in relation to cultural ideals of individualism.
|
Key Quotes (4)
"Obviously, neither a corpse nor a 4-year-old can provide consent"Source
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_015357.jpg
Quote #1
"I believe the only offense here is really violation of private property."Source
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_015357.jpg
Quote #2
"I never understood why people think that having sex with a dead body is worse than raping a living person."Source
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_015357.jpg
Quote #3
"Wait a minute--"Source
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_015357.jpg
Quote #4
Full Extracted Text
Complete text extracted from the document (1,313 characters)
“Obviously, neither a corpse nor a 4-year-old can provide consent, but if you leave permission in your will for your lonesome spouse or significant other to have one last fling with your mortal coil, shouldn’t the state of California respect your wishes?”
“I still think that organ donation is a better cause. It’s just that I believe the only offense here is really violation of private property. I wonder if someone gives their partner, in a will, the right to have sex with their body after their death, will it be legal?”
“Or, even without that permission, if you are an only heir of somebody, doesn’t it mean their body belongs to you? It sounds gross, but isn’t it an issue of private rights in the United States of America, that likes so much the idea of individualism and is ready to exploit people and the environment in the name of that ideal?”
“I never understood why people think that having sex with a dead body is worse than raping a living person. To me, that’s the worst kind, and then raping poor helpless animals. I really couldn’t care less about my own dead body.”
Conversely, Sam Kinison, the late evangelist who turned into a comedian, had a great routine about necrophilia: “Well, that’s it, man-- I’m dead. Nothing else bad can happen to me now. Wait a minute--
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_015357
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document