DOJ-OGR-00021554.jpg
560 KB
Extraction Summary
7
People
1
Organizations
2
Locations
3
Events
6
Relationships
1
Quotes
Document Information
Type:
Legal document
File Size:
560 KB
Summary
This legal document, dated June 29, 2023, details a court's decision to overrule objections in Case 22-1426. The objections concerned the defendant's identification and isolation of minor girls, and a scheme developed by the defendant and Epstein to recruit girls for sexualized massages. The court found that trial evidence and testimony from witnesses like Annie and Jane supported the existence of this recruitment scheme, which involved a chain of recruitment from the defendant to Virginia, then to Carolyn, and further to Carolyn's friends.
People (7)
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Epstein |
Associated with the defendant in isolating and recruiting minor girls, and receiving sexualized massages.
|
|
| Ms. Maxwell |
Mentioned in relation to Epstein's life in the context of the case.
|
|
| defendant | defendant |
Central figure in the legal proceedings, accused of isolating and recruiting minor girls with Epstein, and making obj...
|
| Annie | witness/testifier |
Provided testimony regarding a trip to New Mexico.
|
| Jane | witness/testifier |
Provided testimony about spending time alone with Epstein and the defendant at the Palm Beach residence.
|
| Virginia | recruited minor girl, recruiter |
Recruited by the defendant, then enlisted Carolyn and other girls.
|
| Carolyn | recruited minor girl, recruiter |
Enlisted by Virginia, then recruited at least three friends.
|
Organizations (1)
| Name | Type | Context |
|---|---|---|
| SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C. | company |
Listed at the bottom, likely the court reporting agency.
|
Timeline (3 events)
Locations (2)
| Location | Context |
|---|---|
|
Mentioned in Annie's testimony regarding a trip.
|
|
|
Location of a residence where Jane spent time alone with Epstein and the defendant.
|
Relationships (6)
Epstein's and Ms. Maxwell's lives are mentioned together in the context of the case.
Trial evidence established that the defendant and Epstein isolated girls and developed a scheme.
The scheme started with the defendant's recruitment of Virginia.
Virginia then enlisted Carolyn in addition to at least two other girls.
Carolyn in turn recruited at least three friends, and those friends then brought more girls.
The defendant objected to the assertion that she encouraged minor girls to bring other minor girls to provide Epstein with sexualized massages.
Key Quotes (1)
"constant stream of girls who recruited each other."Source
— defendant and Epstein (as part of the scheme they developed)
(Assertion that the defendant and Epstein developed a scheme that created a 'constant stream of girls who recruited each other.')
DOJ-OGR-00021554.jpg
Quote #1
Full Extracted Text
Complete text extracted from the document (1,611 characters)
Case 22-1426, Document 78, 06/29/2023, 3536039, Page124 of 217
SA-378
9
M6SQmax1
1 to be blind, deaf and dumb, and to say nothing of Epstein's and
2 Ms. Maxwell's lives.
3 Paragraph 26, there's an objection to the
4 characterization concerning the defendant's identification and
5 isolation of minor girls as inconsistent with the trial
6 evidence. I overrule this objection for the same reasons as
7 articulated with respect to paragraph 22. In addition, the
8 trial evidence established that the defendant and Epstein
9 isolated girls by spending time with them alone away from their
10 families. For example, Annie's testimony regarding the trip to
11 New Mexico. Jane's testimony that she would spend time at the
12 Palm Beach residence alone with Epstein and the defendant.
13 Paragraphs 27 and 28 the defendant makes two
14 objections: First, to the assertion that the defendant and
15 Epstein developed a scheme that created a "constant stream of
16 girls who recruited each other." And, second, she objects to
17 the assertion that she encouraged minor girls to bring other
18 minor girls to provide Epstein with sexualized massages.
19 Again, based on the trial testimony and evidence, I
20 overrule the objection. It supported the information in these
21 paragraphs. The evidence indicated the scheme started with the
22 defendant's recruitment of Virginia. Virginia then enlisted
23 Carolyn in addition to at least two other girls. Carolyn in
24 turn recruited at least three friends, and those friends then
25 brought more girls.
SA-378
9
M6SQmax1
1 to be blind, deaf and dumb, and to say nothing of Epstein's and
2 Ms. Maxwell's lives.
3 Paragraph 26, there's an objection to the
4 characterization concerning the defendant's identification and
5 isolation of minor girls as inconsistent with the trial
6 evidence. I overrule this objection for the same reasons as
7 articulated with respect to paragraph 22. In addition, the
8 trial evidence established that the defendant and Epstein
9 isolated girls by spending time with them alone away from their
10 families. For example, Annie's testimony regarding the trip to
11 New Mexico. Jane's testimony that she would spend time at the
12 Palm Beach residence alone with Epstein and the defendant.
13 Paragraphs 27 and 28 the defendant makes two
14 objections: First, to the assertion that the defendant and
15 Epstein developed a scheme that created a "constant stream of
16 girls who recruited each other." And, second, she objects to
17 the assertion that she encouraged minor girls to bring other
18 minor girls to provide Epstein with sexualized massages.
19 Again, based on the trial testimony and evidence, I
20 overrule the objection. It supported the information in these
21 paragraphs. The evidence indicated the scheme started with the
22 defendant's recruitment of Virginia. Virginia then enlisted
23 Carolyn in addition to at least two other girls. Carolyn in
24 turn recruited at least three friends, and those friends then
25 brought more girls.
SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.•••
(212) 805-0300
DOJ-OGR-00021554
(212) 805-0300
DOJ-OGR-00021554
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document