DOJ-OGR-00017935.jpg

590 KB

Extraction Summary

4
People
1
Organizations
0
Locations
1
Events
2
Relationships
3
Quotes

Document Information

Type: Legal document
File Size: 590 KB
Summary

This document is an excerpt from a court transcript dated August 10, 2022, from Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE. It details the direct examination of a witness named Rocchio, who discusses the commonality of delayed disclosure of sexual abuse in clinical and forensic practices. An attorney, Mr. Pagliuca, objects to a question regarding the witness being the first person patients disclose abuse to, but the objection is overruled by the Court.

People (4)

Name Role Context
Rocchio Witness
Being examined during 'Direct' testimony, answering questions (A.)
MR. PAGLIUCA Attorney
Making an objection to a question
Your Honor Judge
Addressed by Mr. Pagliuca; refers to THE COURT
THE COURT Judge
Making a ruling on an objection

Organizations (1)

Name Type Context
SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C. company
Court reporting service provider

Timeline (1 events)

2022-08-10
Direct examination of witness Rocchio regarding the prevalence of delayed disclosure of sexual abuse in clinical and forensic practices. An objection by Mr. Pagliuca was overruled by the Court.
Court (implied by 'SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS')

Relationships (2)

MR. PAGLIUCA professional THE COURT
Mr. Pagliuca addresses the judge as 'Your Honor' and the judge rules on his objection.
Rocchio professional Questioner (unnamed)
Rocchio is providing answers (A.) to questions (Q.) during a direct examination.

Key Quotes (3)

"I'm sorry, can you repeat the question."
Source
— Rocchio (Response to a question during testimony)
DOJ-OGR-00017935.jpg
Quote #1
"Your Honor, I'm going to object to this as not being relevant."
Source
— MR. PAGLIUCA (Objection made during the examination)
DOJ-OGR-00017935.jpg
Quote #2
"Overruled. Thank you."
Source
— THE COURT (Ruling on Mr. Pagliuca's objection)
DOJ-OGR-00017935.jpg
Quote #3

Full Extracted Text

Complete text extracted from the document (1,465 characters)

Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 747 Filed 08/10/22 Page 62 of 228 738
LC2VMAX2
1 that when we talk -- there are a lot of studies that are done,
2 national studies, interviewing, say, adults, asking about a
3 whole range of experiences that they've had during the course
4 of their lifetime. And that research has repeatedly
5 demonstrated that when people -- when you ask people if they
6 acknowledge that they've been abused, particularly sexually
7 abused, during childhood, and then you ask them if they ever
8 told anyone, a significant number will say no, not until this
9 interview. And then others will say yes, and then they are
10 asked when they've told. And we know from the research that
11 often they don't tell until adulthood.
12 Q. In your clinical and forensic practices, have you treated
13 and evaluated patients who did not disclose sexual abuse they
14 experienced as children, but disclosed such abuse later?
15 A. Yes.
16 Q. Without getting into any particular anecdotes of your
17 practices, can you explain.
18 A. I'm sorry, can you repeat the question.
19 Q. Yes. Can you just explain -- let me ask it this way: In
20 your own clinical practice, how common, if at all, is it for
21 you to be the first person your patients have told they were
22 abused?
23 MR. PAGLIUCA: Your Honor, I'm going to object to this
24 as not being relevant.
25 THE COURT: Overruled. Thank you.
SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.
(212) 805-0300
DOJ-OGR-00017935

Discussion 0

Sign in to join the discussion

No comments yet

Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document