This document is an excerpt from a court transcript dated August 10, 2022, from Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE. It details the direct examination of a witness named Rocchio, who discusses the commonality of delayed disclosure of sexual abuse in clinical and forensic practices. An attorney, Mr. Pagliuca, objects to a question regarding the witness being the first person patients disclose abuse to, but the objection is overruled by the Court.
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Rocchio | Witness |
Being examined during 'Direct' testimony, answering questions (A.)
|
| MR. PAGLIUCA | Attorney |
Making an objection to a question
|
| Your Honor | Judge |
Addressed by Mr. Pagliuca; refers to THE COURT
|
| THE COURT | Judge |
Making a ruling on an objection
|
| Name | Type | Context |
|---|---|---|
| SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C. | company |
Court reporting service provider
|
"I'm sorry, can you repeat the question."Source
"Your Honor, I'm going to object to this as not being relevant."Source
"Overruled. Thank you."Source
Complete text extracted from the document (1,465 characters)
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document