This document is an excerpt from a legal transcript, dated January 15, 2025, discussing studies related to sexual abuse. It highlights the remarkable consistency of strategies and techniques identified in such studies across various samples. The document also details the criteria used to evaluate the quality of articles and literature reviews, emphasizing peer review, study methodology, and sample selection.
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Rocchio |
Mentioned in the header as part of a 'Direct' examination
|
| Name | Type | Context |
|---|---|---|
| SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C. | company |
Court reporting service for the document
|
"How do the results of those studies compare?"Source
"There's remarkable consistency. And even though definitions may vary in studies, as they always do, there are common -- a clear set of common strategies, techniques and behaviors that have been identified in the literature across time and across various samples."Source
"When you review articles about grooming, what sorts of things are you looking for to determine the quality of articles you are relying on?"Source
"I'm looking at whether or not it's in a peer review journal. I'm looking at how a particular study was conducted. So for example, if they're doing content analysis of an interview, are they making sure that ways that that interview has been coded by multiple individuals to get some sort of consistency there. I'm looking at how they chose the sample size. I'm looking at if it's a review that summarizes the state of the literature, is the literature review"Source
Complete text extracted from the document (1,596 characters)
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document