DOJ-OGR-00019370.jpg
668 KB
Extraction Summary
5
People
2
Organizations
0
Locations
4
Events
2
Relationships
0
Quotes
Document Information
Type:
Legal document
File Size:
668 KB
Summary
This document, dated September 16, 2020, details legal proceedings involving Maxwell and the Government. It discusses Maxwell's motion to modify protective orders and the Government's opposition, which revealed a grand jury investigation into Jeffrey Epstein and his possible co-conspirators. The Government issued subpoenas to a 'Recipient' and applied ex parte in February 2019 to modify protective orders to ensure compliance with these subpoenas, without notifying Maxwell or her counsel.
People (5)
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Maxwell |
intended to submit filings in civil litigation; filed a motion to modify a Protective Order; was not notified of subp...
|
|
| Jeffrey Epstein |
subject of a grand jury investigation
|
|
| Recipient |
received grand jury subpoenas; advised the Government that existing protective orders precluded full compliance
|
|
| co-conspirators |
possible co-conspirators of Jeffrey Epstein in a grand jury investigation
|
|
| counsel |
Maxwell's counsel, who was not notified of the Subpoenas
|
Organizations (2)
| Name | Type | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Government | government agency |
made applications, filed an opposition, explained factual background, requested to modify protective orders, issued s...
|
| District Court | government agency |
referenced in 'District Court Docket Entry 52' and 'Dist. Ct. Docket Entry 46'
|
Timeline (4 events)
2019
Maxwell's motion sought authorization to use materials relating to applications the Government previously made in 2019 seeking the modification of certain protective orders in other judicial proceedings.
2019-02
The Government applied ex parte and under seal to each relevant court to modify certain protective orders in civil cases to permit compliance with grand jury subpoenas.
2020-08-21
The Government filed an opposition to Maxwell's motion to modify the Protective Order.
Grand jury investigation into Jeffrey Epstein and his possible co-conspirators.
Relationships (2)
grand jury investigation into Jeffrey Epstein and his possible co-conspirators
the Government did not notify Maxwell or her counsel of the Subpoenas
Full Extracted Text
Complete text extracted from the document (1,589 characters)
Case 20-3061, Document 38, 09/16/2020, 2932233, Page4 of 23
Government, in filings Maxwell intended to submit in separate civil litigation.
(District Court Docket Entry 52). In particular, Maxwell's motion sought
authorization to use materials relating to applications the Government previously
made in 2019 seeking the modification of certain protective orders in other judicial
proceedings.
(District Court Docket Entry 52). In particular, Maxwell's motion sought
authorization to use materials relating to applications the Government previously
made in 2019 seeking the modification of certain protective orders in other judicial
proceedings.
5. On August 21, 2020, the Government filed an opposition to
Maxwell's motion to modify the Protective Order. (Dist. Ct. Docket Entry 46). In
its opposition, the Government explained the factual background regarding the
confidential criminal discovery materials at issue. In particular, the Government
explained that those discovery materials related to the Government's requests to
modify certain protective orders in civil cases to permit compliance with grand
jury subpoenas (the “Subpoenas”). Those Subpoenas were issued to a certain
recipient (the “Recipient”) in connection with a grand jury investigation into
Jeffrey Epstein and his possible co-conspirators. In order to maintain the integrity
of the grand jury investigation and in accordance with both Federal Rule of
Criminal Procedure 6(e) and its standard practice, the Government did not notify
Maxwell or her counsel of the Subpoenas. In response to receiving the Subpoenas,
the Recipient advised the Government that it believed that certain existing
protective orders precluded full compliance. Accordingly, in or about February
2019, the Government applied ex parte and under seal to each relevant court to
Maxwell's motion to modify the Protective Order. (Dist. Ct. Docket Entry 46). In
its opposition, the Government explained the factual background regarding the
confidential criminal discovery materials at issue. In particular, the Government
explained that those discovery materials related to the Government's requests to
modify certain protective orders in civil cases to permit compliance with grand
jury subpoenas (the “Subpoenas”). Those Subpoenas were issued to a certain
recipient (the “Recipient”) in connection with a grand jury investigation into
Jeffrey Epstein and his possible co-conspirators. In order to maintain the integrity
of the grand jury investigation and in accordance with both Federal Rule of
Criminal Procedure 6(e) and its standard practice, the Government did not notify
Maxwell or her counsel of the Subpoenas. In response to receiving the Subpoenas,
the Recipient advised the Government that it believed that certain existing
protective orders precluded full compliance. Accordingly, in or about February
2019, the Government applied ex parte and under seal to each relevant court to
4
DOJ-OGR-00019370
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document