DOJ-OGR-00009646.jpg

492 KB

Extraction Summary

3
People
3
Organizations
1
Locations
4
Events
0
Relationships
3
Quotes

Document Information

Type: Legal document
File Size: 492 KB
Summary

This document is a page from a legal filing, dated March 1, 2022, likely a deposition or questionnaire for a potential juror in Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE. It questions the individual about their process of completing a questionnaire under penalty of perjury and their prior communications with various media outlets, including The Independent, Daily Mail, and Reuters, regarding their involvement as a juror. The document also references a section of the questionnaire concerning "Basic Legal Principles and Media Restrictions" relevant to jury service.

People (3)

Name Role Context
Alison J. Nathan The Honorable (Judge)
Addressee or presiding judge in the case
you potential juror
The person being questioned in the document
reporter reporter
Interviewed the 'you' (potential juror)

Organizations (3)

Name Type Context
The Independent publication
UK publication a reporter worked with
Daily Mail publication
UK publication a reporter worked with
Reuters news agency
News agency a reporter worked for

Timeline (4 events)

Signing a questionnaire under penalty of perjury, affirming answers were 'true and correct'.
you (potential juror)
Speaking to the media on several occasions about involvement as a juror.
you (potential juror) reporter
Giving a videotaped interview to a reporter.
you (potential juror) reporter
Reviewing a questionnaire section titled 'Basic Legal Principles and Media Restrictions' on page 8, specifically questions 10-14, regarding acceptance of legal principles to serve on a jury.
you (potential juror)

Locations (1)

Location Context
UK
Location of 'The Independent' and 'Daily Mail' publications

Key Quotes (3)

"true and correct"
Source
— you (potential juror, implied) (Affirming answers on a questionnaire under penalty of perjury.)
DOJ-OGR-00009646.jpg
Quote #1
"flew through"
Source
— you (potential juror, implied) (Describing how the questionnaire was completed to a Reuters reporter.)
DOJ-OGR-00009646.jpg
Quote #2
"Basic Legal Principles and Media Restrictions"
Source
DOJ-OGR-00009646.jpg
Quote #3

Full Extracted Text

Complete text extracted from the document (1,386 characters)

Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 636 Filed 03/01/22 Page 9 of 22
The Honorable Alison J. Nathan
March 1, 2022
Page 9
16. When you got to end of the questionnaire, you signed your name and swore under
penalty of perjury that your answers were "true and correct"?
a. When you are required to affirm the truth of your answers, you read them
carefully before you sign your name?
b. You had the opportunity to go back and check your answers before you signed
the questionnaire?
c. Did you review your answers?
17. You have spoken to the media on several occasions about your involvement as a juror
in this case?
a. You spoke to a reporter working with a UK publication called The
Independent?
b. You spoke to a reporter working with the UK publication called the Daily
Mail?
c. You gave a videotaped interview to that same reporter?
d. And you spoke to a reporter working for Reuters?
e. You told the Reuters reporter that you "flew through" the questionnaire?
18. Please look at page 8 of the questionnaire. That is the section entitled "Basic Legal
Principles and Media Restrictions"?
a. It starts off with a series of questions that ask you whether you can accept
certain legal principles that you must accept in order to serve on the jury?
b. Those are Questions 10-14?
2100689.3
DOJ-OGR-00009646

Discussion 0

Sign in to join the discussion

No comments yet

Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document