DOJ-OGR-00021577.jpg
556 KB
Extraction Summary
4
People
3
Organizations
0
Locations
4
Events
4
Relationships
1
Quotes
Document Information
Type:
Legal document
File Size:
556 KB
Summary
This document, a legal transcript from June 29, 2023, discusses a criminal case, specifically focusing on the roles of Ms. Maxwell and Sarah Kellen. It analyzes trial testimony from Carolyn and Juan Alessi, concluding that Sarah Kellen replaced Ms. Maxwell in scheduling massage appointments, rather than being supervised by her. The text emphasizes a 'clear break' in their respective responsibilities.
People (4)
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Sarah Kellen | criminal participant |
Discussed in relation to supervision by Ms. Maxwell, scheduling massage appointments, and replacing Ms. Maxwell; ment...
|
| Ms. Maxwell | defendant |
Discussed in relation to supervising Sarah Kellen, calling to schedule massage appointments, and being replaced by Sa...
|
| Carolyn | witness |
Provided testimony regarding the break between Ms. Maxwell's and Sarah Kellen's scheduling of massage appointments.
|
| Juan Alessi | witness |
Corroborated Carolyn's testimony regarding Sarah Kellen taking over massage appointment scheduling at the end of his ...
|
Organizations (3)
| Name | Type | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Southern District Reporters, P.C. | company |
Listed as the reporting entity for the document.
|
| the government | government agency |
Concedes a point regarding criminal participants and guidelines.
|
| Second Circuit | government agency |
Mentioned in reference to 'Second Circuit law' regarding supervision of criminal participants.
|
Timeline (4 events)
Discussion of a criminal case involving a defendant, criminal activity, and supervision of participants under Second Circuit law.
defendant
the government
Carolyn's testimony regarding Ms. Maxwell and Sarah Kellen's roles in scheduling massage appointments.
Juan Alessi's testimony corroborating Carolyn's account of Sarah Kellen taking over massage appointment scheduling.
Sarah Kellen replaced Ms. Maxwell in the responsibility of scheduling massage appointments.
Relationships (4)
The document discusses whether Ms. Maxwell was supervising Sarah Kellen, concluding that Sarah Kellen replaced Ms. Maxwell in scheduling massage appointments, indicating a sequential rather than supervisory relationship.
Carolyn provided testimony about Ms. Maxwell's involvement in scheduling massage appointments.
Carolyn provided testimony about Sarah Kellen's involvement in scheduling massage appointments.
Juan Alessi corroborated Carolyn's testimony regarding Sarah Kellen taking over scheduling duties at the end of his employment.
Key Quotes (1)
"He said Sarah Kellen came at the end of my employment, to his recollection, and as soon as she got there, she took over the responsibility of scheduling the massage appointments."Source
— Juan Alessi
(Corroborating the timeline of Sarah Kellen taking over scheduling duties from Ms. Maxwell.)
DOJ-OGR-00021577.jpg
Quote #1
Full Extracted Text
Complete text extracted from the document (1,634 characters)
Case 22-1426, Document 78, 06/29/2023, 3536039, Page147 of 217
SA-401
32
M6SQmax1
1 already been decided or conceded by the defendant. The court
2 found they were leader or the defendant didn't contest that, so
3 the issue was only about whether the criminal activity was
4 otherwise extensive. So that is not -- that is clear under
5 Second Circuit law, that they have to supervise another
6 criminal participant, and it's clear from the guidelines too,
7 as the government concedes.
8 Let's just talk a bit about Sarah Kellen. I don't
9 think it is a fair inference to say from the trial record that
10 Ms. Maxwell was supervising Sarah Kellen. In fact, the
11 inference is exactly the opposite. And you can rely on
12 Carolyn's testimony alone for that; that she herself testified
13 that there was a clear break between when she says that
14 Ms. Maxwell was calling her to schedule for massage
15 appointments versus when Sarah Kellen took over and scheduled
16 for massage appointments. They did not overlap. There was a
17 break. That is corroborated by Juan Alessi no less, who said
18 the same thing. He said Sarah Kellen came at the end of my
19 employment, to his recollection, and as soon as she got there,
20 she took over the responsibility of scheduling the massage
21 appointments. Again, a clear break.
22 What the record shows is that there was a replacement.
23 Sarah Kellen replaced Ms. Maxwell, at least according to the
24 trial testimony; not that there was some sort of ongoing
25 supervision by Ms. Maxwell over Sarah Kellen. It couldn't be
SA-401
32
M6SQmax1
1 already been decided or conceded by the defendant. The court
2 found they were leader or the defendant didn't contest that, so
3 the issue was only about whether the criminal activity was
4 otherwise extensive. So that is not -- that is clear under
5 Second Circuit law, that they have to supervise another
6 criminal participant, and it's clear from the guidelines too,
7 as the government concedes.
8 Let's just talk a bit about Sarah Kellen. I don't
9 think it is a fair inference to say from the trial record that
10 Ms. Maxwell was supervising Sarah Kellen. In fact, the
11 inference is exactly the opposite. And you can rely on
12 Carolyn's testimony alone for that; that she herself testified
13 that there was a clear break between when she says that
14 Ms. Maxwell was calling her to schedule for massage
15 appointments versus when Sarah Kellen took over and scheduled
16 for massage appointments. They did not overlap. There was a
17 break. That is corroborated by Juan Alessi no less, who said
18 the same thing. He said Sarah Kellen came at the end of my
19 employment, to his recollection, and as soon as she got there,
20 she took over the responsibility of scheduling the massage
21 appointments. Again, a clear break.
22 What the record shows is that there was a replacement.
23 Sarah Kellen replaced Ms. Maxwell, at least according to the
24 trial testimony; not that there was some sort of ongoing
25 supervision by Ms. Maxwell over Sarah Kellen. It couldn't be
SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.•••
(212) 805-0300
DOJ-OGR-00021577
(212) 805-0300
DOJ-OGR-00021577
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document