You need to sign in or sign up before continuing.
DOJ-OGR-00013209.jpg
532 KB
Extraction Summary
5
People
1
Organizations
1
Locations
1
Events
3
Relationships
12
Quotes
Document Information
Type:
Legal document (court transcript)
File Size:
532 KB
Summary
This document is a partial transcript from a court proceeding on August 10, 2022, involving Mr. Pagliuca, Ms. Comey, and The Court. The discussion centers on an objection regarding a document's consistency with witness testimony and the potential admission of the document or its factual paragraphs. A key point of inquiry was whether Ms. Maxwell is mentioned in the complaint, to which the answer was confirmed as no, leading to a plan to identify inconsistencies with testimony.
People (5)
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Mr. Pagliuca | Attorney |
Participating in the court proceeding, making statements and answering questions from the Court.
|
| The Court | Judge |
Presiding over the proceeding, asking questions and guiding the discussion.
|
| Ms. Comey | Attorney |
Participating in the court proceeding, clarifying an objection.
|
| Ms. Maxwell |
Mentioned in the context of whether she is named in a complaint.
|
|
| Carolyn |
Appears in the document header, possibly a witness or related to the case name.
|
Organizations (1)
| Name | Type | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Southern District Reporters, P.C. | Company |
Court reporting service responsible for transcribing the proceeding.
|
Timeline (1 events)
2022-08-10
A discussion during a court proceeding regarding an objection, the admission of a document (C4, the state complaint), and whether Ms. Maxwell is mentioned in the complaint. The Court seeks to identify inconsistencies with testimony.
Southern District
Locations (1)
| Location | Context |
|---|---|
|
Implied location of the court, as per 'SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS'.
|
Relationships (3)
Engaging in direct dialogue during a court proceeding, with Mr. Pagliuca addressing the Court as 'Your Honor'.
Ms. Comey addressing the Court as 'Your Honor' and discussing an objection.
Both are attorneys participating in the same court proceeding, discussing objections and testimony.
Key Quotes (12)
"Your Honor, should I sit or stand?"Source
— Mr. Pagliuca
(Asking the Court for guidance on courtroom etiquette.)
DOJ-OGR-00013209.jpg
Quote #1
"I don't mind. I just want to hear you."Source
— The Court
(Responding to Mr. Pagliuca's question about sitting or standing.)
DOJ-OGR-00013209.jpg
Quote #2
"C4 was the state complaint, your Honor. And I'm not sure what the objection was."Source
— Mr. Pagliuca
(Referring to a document and expressing uncertainty about an objection.)
DOJ-OGR-00013209.jpg
Quote #3
"The objection was that it is not inconsistent with the witness's testimony, your Honor. I believe your Honor sustained that objection."Source
— Ms. Comey
(Clarifying the nature of an objection and its outcome.)
DOJ-OGR-00013209.jpg
Quote #4
"That's what I'm hearing you on now. Mr. Pagliuca, you're seeking the admission of the whole document?"Source
— The Court
(Seeking clarification from Mr. Pagliuca regarding the scope of document admission.)
DOJ-OGR-00013209.jpg
Quote #5
"I am, your Honor. Alternatively, the factual paragraphs. This does not have a lot of legalese in it. It didn't seem to be too complicated to me."Source
— Mr. Pagliuca
(Responding to the Court about admitting the document, suggesting factual paragraphs as an alternative.)
DOJ-OGR-00013209.jpg
Quote #6
"Okay. So let's pick up the first factual paragraph."Source
— The Court
(Directing the discussion to a specific part of the document.)
DOJ-OGR-00013209.jpg
Quote #7
"So just by way of background, you inquired about this document and asked if Ms. Maxwell is mentioned anywhere in the complaint; correct?"Source
— The Court
(Recalling a previous inquiry about Ms. Maxwell's mention in a complaint, addressing Mr. Pagliuca.)
DOJ-OGR-00013209.jpg
Quote #8
"Yes."Source
— Mr. Pagliuca
(Confirming the Court's recollection about the inquiry regarding Ms. Maxwell.)
DOJ-OGR-00013209.jpg
Quote #9
"And the answer to that was no?"Source
— The Court
(Asking for confirmation of the answer to the inquiry about Ms. Maxwell.)
DOJ-OGR-00013209.jpg
Quote #10
"Correct."Source
— Mr. Pagliuca
(Confirming that Ms. Maxwell was not mentioned in the complaint.)
DOJ-OGR-00013209.jpg
Quote #11
"So what I think we then need is to take individual statements to determine if there is some inconsistency with the testimony. So point me to the first"Source
— The Court
(Outlining the next step in the proceeding: identifying inconsistencies between statements and testimony.)
DOJ-OGR-00013209.jpg
Quote #12
Full Extracted Text
Complete text extracted from the document (1,239 characters)
Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 753 Filed 08/10/22 Page 196 of 264 1637
LC7Cmax6
Carolyn - cross
(Jury not present)
MR. PAGLIUCA: Your Honor, should I sit or stand?
THE COURT: I don't mind. I just want to hear you.
MR. PAGLIUCA: C4 was the state complaint, your Honor.
And I'm not sure what the objection was.
MS. COMEY: The objection was that it is not
inconsistent with the witness's testimony, your Honor. I
believe your Honor sustained that objection.
THE COURT: That's what I'm hearing you on now.
Mr. Pagliuca, you're seeking the admission of the
whole document?
MR. PAGLIUCA: I am, your Honor. Alternatively, the
factual paragraphs. This does not have a lot of legalese in
it. It didn't seem to be too complicated to me.
THE COURT: Okay. So let's pick up the first factual
paragraph.
So just by way of background, you inquired about this
document and asked if Ms. Maxwell is mentioned anywhere in the
complaint; correct?
MR. PAGLIUCA: Yes.
THE COURT: And the answer to that was no?
MR. PAGLIUCA: Correct.
THE COURT: So what I think we then need is to take
individual statements to determine if there is some
inconsistency with the testimony. So point me to the first
SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.
(212) 805-0300
DOJ-OGR-00013209
LC7Cmax6
Carolyn - cross
(Jury not present)
MR. PAGLIUCA: Your Honor, should I sit or stand?
THE COURT: I don't mind. I just want to hear you.
MR. PAGLIUCA: C4 was the state complaint, your Honor.
And I'm not sure what the objection was.
MS. COMEY: The objection was that it is not
inconsistent with the witness's testimony, your Honor. I
believe your Honor sustained that objection.
THE COURT: That's what I'm hearing you on now.
Mr. Pagliuca, you're seeking the admission of the
whole document?
MR. PAGLIUCA: I am, your Honor. Alternatively, the
factual paragraphs. This does not have a lot of legalese in
it. It didn't seem to be too complicated to me.
THE COURT: Okay. So let's pick up the first factual
paragraph.
So just by way of background, you inquired about this
document and asked if Ms. Maxwell is mentioned anywhere in the
complaint; correct?
MR. PAGLIUCA: Yes.
THE COURT: And the answer to that was no?
MR. PAGLIUCA: Correct.
THE COURT: So what I think we then need is to take
individual statements to determine if there is some
inconsistency with the testimony. So point me to the first
SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.
(212) 805-0300
DOJ-OGR-00013209
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document