DOJ-OGR-00014781.jpg
615 KB
Extraction Summary
8
People
2
Organizations
1
Locations
2
Events
4
Relationships
5
Quotes
Document Information
Type:
Court transcript
File Size:
615 KB
Summary
This court transcript excerpt discusses the supervisory authority of Kellen, an employee, in relation to Maxwell, Epstein, and an unnamed defendant. It details arguments about whether Kellen's actions, such as making calls and scheduling massage appointments, constituted supervisory authority, and mentions testimony from pilots regarding Kellen's reporting structure. The discussion also touches upon a five-point enhancement for sex offenders.
People (8)
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Maxwell |
Mentioned as potentially paying an employee and someone Kellen reported to.
|
|
| Epstein |
Mentioned as potentially paying an employee.
|
|
| Kellen | employee |
Subject of discussion regarding supervisory authority; reported to Maxwell, had a supervisor (the defendant), made ca...
|
| MR. EVERDELL | attorney/speaker |
Speaking in court, arguing a point about supervisory authority and an enhancement.
|
| MS. MOE | attorney/speaker |
Speaking in court, responding to the Court.
|
| THE COURT | judge/judicial body |
Presiding over the proceedings, speaking to the attorneys.
|
| pilots | witnesses |
Testified about Kellen reporting to Maxwell.
|
| defendant | defendant in the case |
Had a supervisory roll over Kellen.
|
Organizations (2)
| Name | Type | Context |
|---|---|---|
| SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C. | company |
Court reporting agency.
|
| government | government agency |
Mentioned in relation to an objection.
|
Locations (1)
| Location | Context |
|---|---|
|
Where Kellen was present, making calls and scheduling massage appointments.
|
Relationships (4)
Pilots thought Kellen reported to Maxwell; Kellen was an employee.
Question of whether an employee was paid by Maxwell or Epstein.
Key Quotes (5)
"Your Honor, just to that point. Being present does not mean that you're a supervisor. That's way too far a stretch. So the fact that there was testimony she was present still in the house while Kellen was making the calls and scheduling the massage appointments means nothing in terms of supervisory authority."Source
— MR. EVERDELL
(Arguing against the implication of supervisory authority based on Kellen's actions.)
DOJ-OGR-00014781.jpg
Quote #1
"Thank you. Other enhancements before the government's objection is to be addressed."Source
— THE COURT
(Acknowledging a point and directing attention to other matters.)
DOJ-OGR-00014781.jpg
Quote #2
"No, your Honor. Thank you."Source
— MS. MOE
(Responding to the Court.)
DOJ-OGR-00014781.jpg
Quote #3
"Your Honor, I assume you don't want to hear or have any questions about the five-point enhancement for repeated and dangerous sex offenders."Source
— MR. EVERDELL
(Asking the Court about a specific legal enhancement.)
DOJ-OGR-00014781.jpg
Quote #4
"I believe I have what I need, but as I"Source
— THE COURT
(Responding to Mr. Everdell's question, indicating the Court has sufficient information.)
DOJ-OGR-00014781.jpg
Quote #5
Full Extracted Text
Complete text extracted from the document (1,540 characters)
Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 779 Filed 08/22/22 Page 34 of 101 34
1 With respect to the testimony of the pilots who
2 testified, whether they -- whether an employee was paid by
3 Maxwell or Epstein or technically reported to one, according to
4 their job descriptions, is not the question here. The fact
5 that pilots based on their observation thought at one point
6 that Kellen reported to Maxwell proves the point that she had
7 supervisory authority over Kellen and exercised it, whether in
8 the chain of command or on their formal employment paperwork,
9 she was just an employee for one or the other, it makes no
10 difference. There was an overlap here. They had different
11 roles in the conspiracy, and the defendant had a supervisory
12 roll over Kellen.
13 MR. EVERDELL: Your Honor, just to that point. Being
14 present does not mean that you're a supervisor. That's way too
15 far a stretch. So the fact that there was testimony she was
16 present still in the house while Kellen was making the calls
17 and scheduling the massage appointments means nothing in terms
18 of supervisory authority.
19 THE COURT: Thank you. Other enhancements before the
20 government's objection is to be addressed.
21 MS. MOE: No, your Honor. Thank you.
22 MR. EVERDELL: Your Honor, I assume you don't want to
23 hear or have any questions about the five-point enhancement for
24 repeated and dangerous sex offenders.
25 THE COURT: I believe I have what I need, but as I
SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.
.
.
.
(212) 805-0300
DOJ-OGR-00014781
1 With respect to the testimony of the pilots who
2 testified, whether they -- whether an employee was paid by
3 Maxwell or Epstein or technically reported to one, according to
4 their job descriptions, is not the question here. The fact
5 that pilots based on their observation thought at one point
6 that Kellen reported to Maxwell proves the point that she had
7 supervisory authority over Kellen and exercised it, whether in
8 the chain of command or on their formal employment paperwork,
9 she was just an employee for one or the other, it makes no
10 difference. There was an overlap here. They had different
11 roles in the conspiracy, and the defendant had a supervisory
12 roll over Kellen.
13 MR. EVERDELL: Your Honor, just to that point. Being
14 present does not mean that you're a supervisor. That's way too
15 far a stretch. So the fact that there was testimony she was
16 present still in the house while Kellen was making the calls
17 and scheduling the massage appointments means nothing in terms
18 of supervisory authority.
19 THE COURT: Thank you. Other enhancements before the
20 government's objection is to be addressed.
21 MS. MOE: No, your Honor. Thank you.
22 MR. EVERDELL: Your Honor, I assume you don't want to
23 hear or have any questions about the five-point enhancement for
24 repeated and dangerous sex offenders.
25 THE COURT: I believe I have what I need, but as I
SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.
.
.
.
(212) 805-0300
DOJ-OGR-00014781
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document