DOJ-OGR-00018357.jpg
617 KB
Extraction Summary
6
People
1
Organizations
0
Locations
2
Events
4
Relationships
4
Quotes
Document Information
Type:
Court transcript
File Size:
617 KB
Summary
This document is an excerpt from a court transcript dated August 10, 2022, detailing a discussion in open court regarding the sealing and redaction of defense exhibits, specifically J15 and a proposed J15R. The core issue is the protection of identifying information related to 'Jane,' who was the subject of a recent cross-examination. Various parties, including Ms. Moe, Mr. Everdell, and Ms. Menninger, debate the necessity and process of sealing these exhibits to prevent the disclosure of sensitive information.
People (6)
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| MR. EVERDELL | Defense counsel (implied) |
Speaks on behalf of 'the defense' in court.
|
| MS. MOE |
Raises an issue regarding exhibits and identifying information for Jane in court.
|
|
| Jane | Witness or subject of cross-examination |
Her identifying information is contained in defense exhibits, and she was cross-examined.
|
| MS. MENNINGER |
Comments on Exhibit J15 and its identifying information in court.
|
|
| THE COURT | Judge |
Presides over the court discussion.
|
| Your Honor | Judge |
Addressed by MR. EVERDELL and MS. MOE.
|
Organizations (1)
| Name | Type | Context |
|---|---|---|
| SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C. | Company |
Court reporting service for the proceedings.
|
Timeline (2 events)
2022-08-10
A discussion in open court regarding the sealing and redaction of defense exhibits (J15 and a proposed J15R) due to identifying information pertaining to Jane, who was recently cross-examined.
In open court
Relationships (4)
Both are participants in a court discussion, likely opposing counsel or involved parties in the same case, discussing defense exhibits.
Jane was cross-examined, and MS. MOE is discussing exhibits containing Jane's identifying information.
MR. EVERDELL represents 'the defense' for whom exhibits containing Jane's information were offered, and MS. MOE conferred with 'defense' about the issue.
MS. MENNINGER is discussing Exhibit J15, which contains identifying information for Jane.
Key Quotes (4)
"Anything else to take up?"Source
— THE COURT
(Opening the floor for further discussion points.)
DOJ-OGR-00018357.jpg
Quote #1
"Nothing from the defense, your Honor."Source
— MR. EVERDELL
(Responding to the Court's inquiry.)
DOJ-OGR-00018357.jpg
Quote #2
"Your Honor, one last issue with respect to three exhibits. We had a chance to review the transcript from last week from the cross examination of Jane, we noticed that there were three defense exhibits that were offered which were not offered under seal but which contained identifying information for Jane, so we wanted to address that. We conferred with defense about that."Source
— MS. MOE
(Introducing the issue of sealing exhibits with Jane's identifying information.)
DOJ-OGR-00018357.jpg
Quote #3
"I don't believe that J15 does have other additional identifying information, but I'm happy to"Source
— MS. MENNINGER
(Expressing a differing view on the content of Exhibit J15.)
DOJ-OGR-00018357.jpg
Quote #4
Full Extracted Text
Complete text extracted from the document (1,493 characters)
Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 751 Filed 08/10/22 Page 20 of 261 1160
LC6Cmax1
LC6Cmax1
(In open court)
THE COURT: Anything else to take up?
MR. EVERDELL: Nothing from the defense, your Honor.
MS. MOE: Your Honor, one last issue with respect to
three exhibits. We had a chance to review the transcript from
last week from the cross examination of Jane, we noticed that
there were three defense exhibits that were offered which were
not offered under seal but which contained identifying
information for Jane, so we wanted to address that. We
conferred with defense about that.
three exhibits. We had a chance to review the transcript from
last week from the cross examination of Jane, we noticed that
there were three defense exhibits that were offered which were
not offered under seal but which contained identifying
information for Jane, so we wanted to address that. We
conferred with defense about that.
Taking those exhibits in order, the first is
Defendant's Exhibit J15. So this exhibit contains some
redactions, but there is additional identifying information as
to Jane. I flagged that for defense counsel. What we would
propose is that we work together to mark a further redacted
version which would become J15R, and that J15 itself would
remain as it is and under seal as it is offered during her
testimony. So we'll work with the defense to propose
additional redactions, mark that, and make sure that that's in
the record, but I just wanted to flag that because, as it
stands, the underlying exhibit is not yet received under seal
and because that contains identifying information, we'd ask
that that exhibit be sealed at this juncture.
Defendant's Exhibit J15. So this exhibit contains some
redactions, but there is additional identifying information as
to Jane. I flagged that for defense counsel. What we would
propose is that we work together to mark a further redacted
version which would become J15R, and that J15 itself would
remain as it is and under seal as it is offered during her
testimony. So we'll work with the defense to propose
additional redactions, mark that, and make sure that that's in
the record, but I just wanted to flag that because, as it
stands, the underlying exhibit is not yet received under seal
and because that contains identifying information, we'd ask
that that exhibit be sealed at this juncture.
MS. MENNINGER: I don't believe that J15 does have
other additional identifying information, but I'm happy to
other additional identifying information, but I'm happy to
SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.
(212) 805-0300
(212) 805-0300
DOJ-OGR-00018357
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document