DOJ-OGR-00017818.jpg
530 KB
Extraction Summary
6
People
1
Organizations
0
Locations
1
Events
3
Relationships
1
Quotes
Document Information
Type:
Legal document
File Size:
530 KB
Summary
This document is a court transcript from August 10, 2022. After a witness named Jane is excused, the court calls for a break. An attorney, Ms. Sternheim, then raises a procedural issue, requesting a proffer from the government regarding the testimony of the next witness, Matt, to ensure it complies with evidence rules and avoids improper statements.
People (6)
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| MS. MENNINGER | Attorney |
States "No recross. Thank you." indicating the conclusion of a witness's testimony.
|
| Jane | Witness |
Addressed by the Court as she is excused from the stand after her testimony.
|
| THE COURT | Judge |
Presiding over the proceedings, excusing a witness, addressing the jury, and engaging in discussion with the attorneys.
|
| MS. MOE | Attorney |
Responds to the Court on behalf of the government, stating there are no matters to take up before the break.
|
| MS. STERNHEIM | Attorney |
Raises a legal matter concerning the upcoming testimony of the next witness, Matt.
|
| Matt | Witness |
Mentioned as the next witness to testify, whose testimony is the subject of a procedural discussion.
|
Organizations (1)
| Name | Type | Context |
|---|---|---|
| SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C. | company |
Listed at the bottom of the transcript as the court reporting service.
|
Timeline (1 events)
2022-08-10
A witness, Jane, is excused from the stand following her testimony. The court calls for a mid-afternoon break for the jury. A legal discussion ensues between the judge and attorneys regarding the testimony of the next witness, Matt.
Courtroom
Relationships (3)
Ms. Sternheim, an attorney, addresses the Court (the judge) to raise a legal matter concerning witness testimony.
Ms. Moe, an attorney for the government, responds to a question from the Court.
Key Quotes (1)
"I believe the next witness is Matt, whose issue was teed up yesterday. In advance of his testimony, just to make sure that it is compliant with the Federal Rules of Evidence, I would request that the government give a proffer of what he is going to say, as there are things in his 3500 material that did not come out on direct examination, and it would be improper for him to be able to testify as to things that are not prior consistent statements."Source
— MS. STERNHEIM
(Raising a procedural issue to the judge regarding the scope of the next witness's testimony.)
DOJ-OGR-00017818.jpg
Quote #1
Full Extracted Text
Complete text extracted from the document (1,302 characters)
Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 745 Filed 08/10/22 Page 209 of 264
LC1Qmax6 Jane - Redirect 620
LC1Qmax6 Jane - Redirect 620
1 MS. MENNINGER: No recross. Thank you.
2 THE COURT: Thank you, Jane. You may step down. You
3 are excused.
4 (Witness excused)
5 THE COURT: Members of the jury, we will take our
6 mid-afternoon break. Your snacks are here. We will break for
7 about 15 minutes. Thank you.
8 (Jurors not present)
9 THE COURT: You may be seated.
10 Matters to take up before the break?
11 MS. MOE: Not from the government, your Honor.
12 MS. STERNHEIM: I have a matter, Judge. I believe the
13 next witness is Matt, whose issue was teed up yesterday. In
14 advance of his testimony, just to make sure that it is
15 compliant with the Federal Rules of Evidence, I would request
16 that the government give a proffer of what he is going to say,
17 as there are things in his 3500 material that did not come out
18 on direct examination, and it would be improper for him to be
19 able to testify as to things that are not prior consistent
20 statements.
21 THE COURT: There are things in his 3500 material that
22 the previous witness said to him --
23 MS. STERNHEIM: Yes.
24 THE COURT: -- that were not asked about of the
25 witness.
SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.
(212) 805-0300
(212) 805-0300
DOJ-OGR-00017818
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document