EFTA00025037.pdf

140 KB

Extraction Summary

6
People
2
Organizations
1
Locations
2
Events
2
Relationships
4
Quotes

Document Information

Type: Email chain / legal correspondence
File Size: 140 KB
Summary

This document is an email chain from October 2021 between the defense team for Ghislaine Maxwell (Christian Everdell, Bobbi Sternheim, etc.) and the US Attorney's Office (SDNY). The correspondence concerns the scheduling and procedure for filing a 'request to charge' (jury instructions) with Judge Nathan. The parties discuss extensions, the possibility of filing separate requests rather than a joint one, and agree to a schedule where the Government files first, followed by the Defense's redline or separate filing in early November.

People (6)

Name Role Context
Christian Everdell Defense Attorney
Primary correspondent for the defense team, negotiating deadlines with SDNY.
Bobbi C Sternheim Defense Attorney
Recipient of emails, part of the defense team.
Jeff Pagliuca Defense Attorney
Recipient of emails, part of the defense team.
Laura Menninger Defense Attorney
Recipient of emails, part of the defense team.
Judge Nathan Judge
The judge presiding over the case to whom the letters and charges are addressed.
[Redacted Name] Assistant United States Attorney
Primary correspondent for the Government (SDNY), negotiating with Everdell.

Organizations (2)

Name Type Context
SDNY
Southern District of New York (US Attorney's Office), representing the Government.
USANYS
United States Attorneys New York South (appearing in email header).

Timeline (2 events)

2021-10-27
Original due date for the joint proposed request to charge (RTC) to the Court.
The Court (Judge Nathan)
Defense Team SDNY
2021-11-03
Proposed deadline for the defense redline or separate RTC.
The Court
Defense Team

Locations (1)

Location Context
Jurisdiction of the legal proceedings.

Relationships (2)

Christian Everdell Colleagues/Co-Counsel Bobbi C Sternheim
Copied on same defense team emails.
Christian Everdell Opposing Counsel [Redacted] (SDNY)
Negotiating deadlines and filing procedures via email chain.

Key Quotes (4)

"I don’t think everyone from SDNY needs to be on this call, but I leave that to you."
Source
EFTA00025037.pdf
Quote #1
"Attached is the letter we intend to file with the Court regarding the extension to file the jury charge."
Source
EFTA00025037.pdf
Quote #2
"We know Judge Nathan asked for a joint RTC, but what about asking Judge Nathan to let us file separate ones?"
Source
EFTA00025037.pdf
Quote #3
"Given all of the other things we have going on this week, the defense would like a little more time to submit the joint requests to charge."
Source
EFTA00025037.pdf
Quote #4

Full Extracted Text

Complete text extracted from the document (4,685 characters)

From: Christian Everdell <[REDACTED]>
To: [REDACTED]
Subject: [EXTERNAL] RE: Draft joint proposed request to charge
Date: Mon, 25 Oct 2021 22:58:41 +0000
Attachments: 2021.10.25_Letter_to_Judge_Nathan_re__Extension_of_Time.DOCX
[REDACTED] –
Attached is the letter we intend to file with the Court regarding the extension to file the jury charge. It should reflect everything we discussed on our call earlier today.
Please let me know if you have any issues with it as soon as you can. I’d like to file it in the next hour or so.
Thanks,
Chris
From: [REDACTED]
Sent: Monday, October 25, 2021 2:29 PM
To: Christian Everdell <[REDACTED]>; BOBBI C STERNHEIM <[REDACTED]>; Jeff Pagliuca <[REDACTED]>; Laura Menninger <[REDACTED]>
Cc: [REDACTED]
Subject: RE: Draft joint proposed request to charge
Hi Chris,
That works. I’m around this afternoon – give me a call at [REDACTED] whenever you have a minute.
Thanks,
[REDACTED]
From: Christian Everdell <[REDACTED]>
Sent: Monday, October 25, 2021 1:56 PM
To: [REDACTED]; BOBBI C STERNHEIM <[REDACTED]>; Jeff Pagliuca <[REDACTED]>; Laura Menninger <[REDACTED]>
Cc: [REDACTED]
Subject: [EXTERNAL] RE: Draft joint proposed request to charge
[REDACTED] –
I think I have a way to come to an agreement on this. I know today is extremely busy for all of us, but can you and I have a 5 min. call to discuss? I don’t think everyone from SDNY needs to be on this call, but I leave that to you.
Thanks,
Chris
EFTA00025037
From: [REDACTED]
Sent: Sunday, October 24, 2021 3:10 PM
To: Christian Everdell <[REDACTED]>; BOBBI C STERNHEIM <[REDACTED]>; Jeff Pagliuca <[REDACTED]>; Laura Menninger <[REDACTED]>
Cc: [REDACTED]
Subject: RE: Draft joint proposed request to charge
Hi Chris,
I think the answer is yes, but just to make sure: we’d file the Government’s proposal on Wednesday, you’d file whatever redline you like on November 3. It also occurs to us that, since your redline will presumably contain new proposals/objections to ours and would not include our views, we’d want to file a short reply on November 5 or 8.
We’d consent to that option and, if you like, would join your motion for that schedule.
Thanks,
[REDACTED]
From: Christian Everdell <[REDACTED]>
Sent: Sunday, October 24, 2021 12:35 PM
To: [REDACTED]; BOBBI C STERNHEIM <[REDACTED]>; Jeff Pagliuca <[REDACTED]>; Laura Menninger <[REDACTED]>
Cc: [REDACTED] (USANYS) <[REDACTED]>
Subject: [EXTERNAL] RE: Draft joint proposed request to charge
Hi [REDACTED] –
I just want to clarify the redline option. If we did the redline option, would you file the government’s RTC (without defense comment) on Oct. 27 and then we would file the joint RTC (i.e., our redline of your RTCs) on Nov. 3? And you would consent to that option?
Thanks,
Chris
From: [REDACTED]
Sent: Friday, October 22, 2021 2:30 PM
To: Christian Everdell <[REDACTED]>; BOBBI C STERNHEIM <[REDACTED]>; Jeff Pagliuca <[REDACTED]>; Laura Menninger <[REDACTED]>
Cc: [REDACTED]
Subject: RE: Draft joint proposed request to charge
Hi Chris,
We had another idea that might facilitate things. We know Judge Nathan asked for a joint RTC, but what about asking Judge Nathan to let us file separate ones? We would also be comfortable setting a deadline for the defense RTC (or a defense redline of ours) on November 3.
If you were to make a request to file separate RTCs, with your deadline on November 3, we would join that request.
Thanks,
[REDACTED]
EFTA00025038
From: Christian Everdell <[REDACTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, October 20, 2021 4:07 PM
To: [REDACTED]; BOBBI C STERNHEIM <[REDACTED]>; Jeff Pagliuca <[REDACTED]>; Laura Menninger <[REDACTED]>
Cc: [REDACTED]
Subject: [EXTERNAL] RE: Draft joint proposed request to charge
Hi [REDACTED] –
Given all of the other things we have going on this week, the defense would like a little more time to submit the joint requests to charge. We plan to ask the Court for an extension until Monday, Nov. 1. Does the government consent to that request?
Thanks,
Chris
From: [REDACTED]
Sent: Wednesday, October 20, 2021 12:30 PM
To: Christian Everdell <[REDACTED]>; BOBBI C STERNHEIM <[REDACTED]>; Jeff Pagliuca <[REDACTED]>; Laura Menninger <[REDACTED]>
Cc: [REDACTED]
Subject: Draft joint proposed request to charge
Counsel,
Attached please find a draft joint proposed request to charge. Since this is due to the Court on Wednesday, October 27, please send us your comments by Sunday, October 24. Please also send us your comments, including any additional proposed jury instructions, as a redline to this document.
Thanks,
[REDACTED]
[REDACTED]
Assistant United States Attorney
Southern District of New York
[REDACTED]
[REDACTED]
[REDACTED]
EFTA00025039

Discussion 0

Sign in to join the discussion

No comments yet

Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document