DOJ-OGR-00014697.jpg
628 KB
Extraction Summary
2
People
3
Organizations
1
Locations
3
Events
1
Relationships
4
Quotes
Document Information
Type:
Legal document
File Size:
628 KB
Summary
This document is a court transcript page from a case dated August 10, 2022. It captures a discussion between Mr. Everdell and the Court regarding a note from the jury. The jury is asking if a defendant can be found guilty solely for aiding and abetting a return flight from New Mexico, considered separately from the initial flight to New Mexico. Mr. Everdell argues that the answer should be 'no' based on the court's instructions that the travel must have a 'significant or motivating purpose'.
People (2)
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Mr. Everdell |
An individual, likely an attorney, addressing the court and arguing how to respond to a juror's note.
|
|
| The Court | Judicial body |
Presiding over the case, addressed by Mr. Everdell, and asking clarifying questions.
|
Organizations (3)
| Name | Type | Context |
|---|---|---|
| THE COURT | Government agency |
The judicial body presiding over the legal proceedings.
|
| SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C. | Company |
The court reporting agency that transcribed the document.
|
| government | Government agency |
Mentioned as having pointed to specific instructions from the Court.
|
Timeline (3 events)
2022-08-10
A discussion between Mr. Everdell and the Court about how to properly instruct the jury in response to their question.
Courtroom
A flight to New Mexico, which is being considered separately from the return flight by the jury.
New Mexico
A flight back from New Mexico, which is the subject of a juror's question regarding guilt for aiding and abetting.
New Mexico
Locations (1)
| Location | Context |
|---|---|
|
The destination and origin of flights being discussed in the court case.
|
Relationships (1)
Mr. Everdell addresses the Court as 'Your Honor' and presents legal arguments in a formal courtroom setting.
Key Quotes (4)
"Your Honor, I think the answer to this question is no, and I'll tell you the rationale for this."Source
— MR. EVERDELL
(Stating his proposed answer to the jury's question.)
DOJ-OGR-00014697.jpg
Quote #1
"As to the jurors' note, they've clearly separated out in their minds the flight to New Mexico versus the flight back from New Mexico."Source
— MR. EVERDELL
(Explaining his interpretation of the jury's thinking process.)
DOJ-OGR-00014697.jpg
Quote #2
"And they are asking can she be found guilty solely on if there's some aiding and abetting, some helping of that flight from New Mexico, which presumably the flight home they're saying."Source
— MR. EVERDELL
(Paraphrasing the specific legal question posed by the jury.)
DOJ-OGR-00014697.jpg
Quote #3
"So the flight from New Mexico to where?"Source
— THE COURT
(Asking a clarifying question about the details of the flight being discussed.)
DOJ-OGR-00014697.jpg
Quote #4
Full Extracted Text
Complete text extracted from the document (1,625 characters)
Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 773 Filed 08/10/22 Page 11 of 29 3128
LCRVMAXT
LCRVMAXT
1 respect to the second element. Beyond that, we're not able to
2 parse the question because we find it confusing; so we think
3 the safest course is to refer the jurors to the comprehensive
4 instruction with respect to the second element.
5 THE COURT: Mr. Everdell.
6 MR. EVERDELL: Your Honor, I think the answer to this
7 question is no, and I'll tell you the rationale for this.
8 As to the jurors' note, they've clearly separated out
9 in their minds the flight to New Mexico versus the flight back
10 from New Mexico. And in their minds, there still is a
11 question, it would seem, that the flight -- whatever the
12 purpose of the flight to New Mexico was, whether it was for
13 illicit sexual activity or not, that is different from the
14 purpose of the flight back from New Mexico. And they are
15 asking can she be found guilty solely on if there's some aiding
16 and abetting, some helping of that flight from New Mexico,
17 which presumably the flight home they're saying.
18 THE COURT: So the flight from New Mexico to where?
19 MR. EVERDELL: Well, there is no record of a flight
20 from New Mexico. But what they are saying, I think, in this
21 note is they are separating out in their minds the flight to
22 New Mexico versus whatever flight she may have taken from New
23 Mexico. And I would say based on the instructions in the
24 Court's instructions which the government pointed to, there has
25 to be -- the significant or motivating purpose of the travel
2 parse the question because we find it confusing; so we think
3 the safest course is to refer the jurors to the comprehensive
4 instruction with respect to the second element.
5 THE COURT: Mr. Everdell.
6 MR. EVERDELL: Your Honor, I think the answer to this
7 question is no, and I'll tell you the rationale for this.
8 As to the jurors' note, they've clearly separated out
9 in their minds the flight to New Mexico versus the flight back
10 from New Mexico. And in their minds, there still is a
11 question, it would seem, that the flight -- whatever the
12 purpose of the flight to New Mexico was, whether it was for
13 illicit sexual activity or not, that is different from the
14 purpose of the flight back from New Mexico. And they are
15 asking can she be found guilty solely on if there's some aiding
16 and abetting, some helping of that flight from New Mexico,
17 which presumably the flight home they're saying.
18 THE COURT: So the flight from New Mexico to where?
19 MR. EVERDELL: Well, there is no record of a flight
20 from New Mexico. But what they are saying, I think, in this
21 note is they are separating out in their minds the flight to
22 New Mexico versus whatever flight she may have taken from New
23 Mexico. And I would say based on the instructions in the
24 Court's instructions which the government pointed to, there has
25 to be -- the significant or motivating purpose of the travel
SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.
(212) 805-0300
(212) 805-0300
DOJ-OGR-00014697
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document