DOJ-OGR-00013001.jpg
582 KB
Extraction Summary
6
People
1
Organizations
1
Locations
1
Events
1
Relationships
4
Quotes
Document Information
Type:
Legal document
File Size:
582 KB
Summary
This document is a court transcript from August 10, 2022, detailing a legal argument over the admissibility of photographs in a trial. The prosecution, represented by Ms. Moe, argues that the photos are relevant to prove the long-term, close relationship between Ms. Maxwell and Mr. Epstein, countering the defense's claim that she was merely a personal assistant. After a brief exchange where the defense (Ms. Menninger) questions the evidence, the judge overrules the objection, allowing the photographs to be admitted.
People (6)
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| MS. MOE | Attorney |
Speaker in the transcript, arguing for the relevance of photographs as evidence.
|
| Ms. Maxwell | Defendant (implied) |
Subject of the legal argument; the defense tried to distance her from Mr. Epstein, suggesting she was only a personal...
|
| Mr. Epstein |
Mentioned in relation to his affairs and his relationship with Ms. Maxwell.
|
|
| MS. MENNINGER | Attorney |
Speaker in the transcript, objecting to the evidence and questioning how photographs show time.
|
| THE COURT | Judge |
Speaker in the transcript, who ultimately overrules the objection.
|
| Meder | Witness (implied) |
Mentioned in the header as 'Meder - direct', suggesting this transcript is from the direct examination of a witness n...
|
Organizations (1)
| Name | Type | Context |
|---|---|---|
| SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C. | company |
Listed at the bottom of the page as the court reporting service.
|
Timeline (1 events)
2022-08-10
A legal argument occurred during a trial regarding the admissibility of photographs intended to demonstrate the nature and duration of the relationship between Ms. Maxwell and Mr. Epstein. The defense's objection was overruled by the court.
Court in the Southern District (implied)
Locations (1)
| Location | Context |
|---|---|
|
Implied by the name of the court reporting company, 'SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.'
|
Relationships (1)
The document discusses photographs showing their 'close relationship throughout time'. The defense is said to have argued she was 'only a personal assistant' and that their affairs were 'compartmentalized', while the prosecution argues the photos prove otherwise.
Key Quotes (4)
"On that score, your Honor, throughout this trial, the defense has repeatedly tried to distance Ms. Maxwell from Mr. Epstein and his affairs and argue that things were compartmentalized."Source
— MS. MOE
(Explaining the defense's strategy and the need for evidence to counter it.)
DOJ-OGR-00013001.jpg
Quote #1
"These photographs show their close relationship throughout time and are directly relevant."Source
— MS. MOE
(Arguing for the admissibility of photographs as evidence.)
DOJ-OGR-00013001.jpg
Quote #2
"Your Honor, given the change in hairstyles, the people in the photographs are clearly aging throughout time, I think that relationship and its duration throughout time is evident from the photographs themselves."Source
— MS. MOE
(Responding to the objection that the photos don't show time by pointing to visual cues of aging.)
DOJ-OGR-00013001.jpg
Quote #3
"Overruled. Anything else?"Source
— THE COURT
(The judge's ruling on the objection to the photographs.)
DOJ-OGR-00013001.jpg
Quote #4
Full Extracted Text
Complete text extracted from the document (1,418 characters)
Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 751 Filed 08/10/22 Page 250 of 261 1411
LC6Cmax7 Meder - direct
LC6Cmax7 Meder - direct
1 MS. MOE: On that score, your Honor, throughout this
2 trial, the defense has repeatedly tried to distance Ms. Maxwell
3 from Mr. Epstein and his affairs and argue that things were
4 compartmentalized. I believe in the cross examination of some
5 witnesses, they repeatedly suggested that she was only a
6 personal assistant.
7 These photographs show their close relationship
8 throughout time and are directly relevant. There is nothing
9 cumulative about that. In fact, it speaks directly to one of
10 the issues at the heart of this case, and for that reason,
11 these photographs are certainly relevant.
12 MS. MENNINGER: I'm not sure how they show time, your
13 Honor. There are no date stamps on the photographs.
14 MS. MOE: Your Honor, given the change in hairstyles,
15 the people in the photographs are clearly aging throughout
16 time, I think that relationship and its duration throughout
17 time is evident from the photographs themselves.
18 THE COURT: Overruled. Anything else?
19 MS. MENNINGER: As to all, your Honor, including the
20 testifying witnesses?
21 THE COURT: I'm sorry.
22 MS. MENNINGER: Including as to the testifying
23 witnesses --
24 THE COURT: What exhibit number?
25 MS. MENNINGER: The first one, your Honor, I referred
2 trial, the defense has repeatedly tried to distance Ms. Maxwell
3 from Mr. Epstein and his affairs and argue that things were
4 compartmentalized. I believe in the cross examination of some
5 witnesses, they repeatedly suggested that she was only a
6 personal assistant.
7 These photographs show their close relationship
8 throughout time and are directly relevant. There is nothing
9 cumulative about that. In fact, it speaks directly to one of
10 the issues at the heart of this case, and for that reason,
11 these photographs are certainly relevant.
12 MS. MENNINGER: I'm not sure how they show time, your
13 Honor. There are no date stamps on the photographs.
14 MS. MOE: Your Honor, given the change in hairstyles,
15 the people in the photographs are clearly aging throughout
16 time, I think that relationship and its duration throughout
17 time is evident from the photographs themselves.
18 THE COURT: Overruled. Anything else?
19 MS. MENNINGER: As to all, your Honor, including the
20 testifying witnesses?
21 THE COURT: I'm sorry.
22 MS. MENNINGER: Including as to the testifying
23 witnesses --
24 THE COURT: What exhibit number?
25 MS. MENNINGER: The first one, your Honor, I referred
SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.
(212) 805-0300
(212) 805-0300
DOJ-OGR-00013001
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document