This document is a docket sheet from a legal case involving Ghislaine Maxwell, dated January 12, 2021. It logs court activities from December 10 to December 18, 2020, including the filing of a conference transcript, orders regarding Maxwell's renewed application for bail, and the court's decision to allow redactions based on established legal tests. The entries also note the filing of a letter and memorandum by Maxwell's counsel and a notice of appearance by an attorney for the USA.
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Alison J. Nathan | Judge |
Mentioned as the presiding judge who signed orders and before whom a conference was held.
|
| Ghislaine Maxwell | Defendant |
The subject of the legal proceedings, including a conference transcript, bail applications, and court orders.
|
| Kristen Carannante | Court Reporter/Transcriber |
Listed as the court reporter for a conference held on 7/14/2020.
|
| McGuirk, Kelly |
Name associated with the entry of the transcript and notice of filing.
|
|
| Christian R. Everdell |
Addressed a letter to Judge Nathan on behalf of Ghislaine Maxwell regarding a renewed bail application and filed a me...
|
|
| Andrew Rohrbach | Attorney |
Filed a notice of attorney appearance for the USA.
|
| Nixon |
Mentioned in the case citation Nixon v. Warner Commc'ns, Inc.
|
| Name | Type | Context |
|---|---|---|
| PACER | Government Agency |
Mentioned as the system through which transcripts can be obtained after the restriction period.
|
| Pyramid Co. of Onondaga | Company |
Mentioned in the case citation Lugosch v. Pyramid Co. of Onondaga.
|
| Warner Commc'ns, Inc. | Company |
Mentioned in the case citation Nixon v. Warner Commc'ns, Inc.
|
| USA | Government Agency |
The party for whom attorney Andrew Rohrbach is appearing.
|
| The Government | Government Agency |
Mentioned as having filed its opposition to Defendant Ghislaine Maxwell's renewed application for bail.
|
"judicial documents"Source
"balance competing considerations"Source
"Such countervailing factors include but are not limited to the danger of impairing law enforcement or judicial efficiency' and 'the privacy interests of those resisting disclosure.'"Source
"Amodeo II"Source
"'relevant to the performance of the judicial function and useful in the judicial process,'"Source
"Amodeo I"Source
Complete text extracted from the document (4,798 characters)
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document