DOJ-OGR-00021552.jpg

519 KB

Extraction Summary

7
People
1
Organizations
1
Locations
1
Events
3
Relationships
3
Quotes

Document Information

Type: Legal document
File Size: 519 KB
Summary

This court transcript page, dated June 29, 2023, documents a judge overruling several objections from attorney Mr. Everdell. The judge upholds evidence against the defendant, Ms. Maxwell, including testimony that she targeted a victim named Virginia, metadata suggesting she authored an essay, and the assertion that she received approximately $23 million from co-conspirator Epstein.

People (7)

Name Role Context
Mr. Everdell Attorney
An attorney making objections to the court on behalf of a client.
Juan Alessi Witness
His testimony is credited by the court regarding the defendant identifying and targeting Virginia.
Virginia Victim
A person who was identified and targeted by the defendant after being seen in the Mar-a-Lago parking lot.
Epstein Co-conspirator
Mentioned as someone the defendant worked with to target 'Jane' and who transferred approximately $23 million to Ms. ...
Jane Potential Victim
A person the defendant and Epstein worked to identify and target.
Ms. Maxwell Defendant
The defendant in the case, accused of authoring an essay, targeting victims, and receiving $23 million from Epstein.
Ghislaine User Name
A user name under which a document was saved, implied to be Ghislaine Maxwell.

Organizations (1)

Name Type Context
SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C. company
Listed at the bottom of the page as the court reporting service.

Timeline (1 events)

2023-06-29
A judge overrules several objections made by Mr. Everdell regarding evidence and testimony against the defendant, Ms. Maxwell.
Courtroom (implied)
THE COURT Mr. Everdell

Locations (1)

Location Context
The location where the defendant saw and subsequently targeted Virginia.

Relationships (3)

Ms. Maxwell Co-conspirators Epstein
The document states 'The defendant also worked with Epstein to identify and target Jane' and that Epstein transferred $23 million to Ms. Maxwell 'during the conspiracy'.
Ms. Maxwell Perpetrator-Victim Virginia
The document states that 'the defendant identified and targeted Virginia'.
Ms. Maxwell Perpetrator-Potential Victim Jane
The document states 'The defendant also worked with Epstein to identify and target Jane'.

Key Quotes (3)

"I overrule the objection. I do credit Juan Alessi's testimony that the defendant identified and targeted Virginia after seeing her in the Mar-a-Lago parking lot."
Source
— THE COURT (The judge's ruling on an objection related to paragraph 22 of a document.)
DOJ-OGR-00021552.jpg
Quote #1
"Metadata indicated that the computer was registered to "GMax" and the document was saved under the user name "Ghislaine.""
Source
— THE COURT (The judge's reasoning for overruling an objection regarding Ms. Maxwell's authorship of an essay.)
DOJ-OGR-00021552.jpg
Quote #2
"The second objection is to the assertion that Epstein transferred Ms. Maxwell approximately $23 million during the conspiracy. I overrule that objection."
Source
— THE COURT (The judge's ruling on an objection concerning a financial transaction between Epstein and Ms. Maxwell.)
DOJ-OGR-00021552.jpg
Quote #3

Full Extracted Text

Complete text extracted from the document (1,463 characters)

Case 22-1426, Document 78, 06/29/2023, 3536039, Page122 of 217
SA-376
7
M6SQmax1
1 material to sentencing or not, I am prepared to address it.
2 So I believe the first -- what I see as your first
3 continued objection is to paragraph 22.
4 MR. EVERDELL: I'm just getting my submissions.
5 Yes, that's correct, your Honor.
6 THE COURT: I overrule the objection. I do credit
7 Juan Alessi's testimony that the defendant identified and
8 targeted Virginia after seeing her in the Mar-a-Lago parking
9 lot. The defendant also worked with Epstein to identify and
10 target Jane.
11 Paragraph three I see three objections to this
12 paragraph. Is that a continuing objection, Mr. Everdell?
13 MR. EVERDELL: Paragraph three, your Honor?
14 THE COURT: 23. I apologize.
15 MR. EVERDELL: Yes, your Honor.
16 THE COURT: I overrule the objection. The first
17 objection is regarding the conclusion that Ms. Maxwell was the
18 author of the essay in the paragraph. I overrule the objection
19 because a reasonable inference supported by the trial evidence
20 is that the defendant authored the essay. Metadata indicated
21 that the computer was registered to "GMax" and the document was
22 saved under the user name "Ghislaine."
23 The second objection is to the assertion that Epstein
24 transferred Ms. Maxwell approximately $23 million during the
25 conspiracy. I overrule that objection. Bank statements
SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.•••
(212) 805-0300
DOJ-OGR-00021552

Discussion 0

Sign in to join the discussion

No comments yet

Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document