DOJ-OGR-00014611.jpg

592 KB

Extraction Summary

1
People
1
Organizations
0
Locations
1
Events
0
Relationships
3
Quotes

Document Information

Type: Legal document
File Size: 592 KB
Summary

This document is a page from a court filing, specifically a jury charge in the criminal case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE against Ms. Maxwell, filed on August 10, 2022. It outlines the legal definition and tests for 'aiding and abetting' by presenting three specific questions for the jury to consider. The document also introduces Instruction No. 31 concerning conspiracy charges under Title 18 for Counts One, Three, and Five of the indictment.

People (1)

Name Role Context
Ms. Maxwell Defendant
Mentioned throughout the document as the defendant being charged with aiding, abetting, and conspiracy.

Organizations (1)

Name Type Context
SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C. Company
Listed at the bottom of the page, likely the court reporting agency that transcribed the proceedings.

Timeline (1 events)

2022-08-10
Filing of a court document containing jury instructions for the case against Ms. Maxwell.

Key Quotes (3)

"Did the defendant participate in the crime charged as something she wished to bring about?"
Source
— Judge (implied) (The first of three questions the jury must ask to determine if the defendant is an aider and abettor.)
DOJ-OGR-00014611.jpg
Quote #1
"Did the defendant knowingly and willfully associate herself with the criminal venture?"
Source
— Judge (implied) (The second of three questions the jury must ask to determine if the defendant is an aider and abettor.)
DOJ-OGR-00014611.jpg
Quote #2
"Did the defendant seek by her actions to make the criminal venture succeed?"
Source
— Judge (implied) (The third of three questions the jury must ask to determine if the defendant is an aider and abettor.)
DOJ-OGR-00014611.jpg
Quote #3

Full Extracted Text

Complete text extracted from the document (1,472 characters)

Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 767 Filed 08/10/22 Page 211 of 257
LCKVMAX8
Charge
1 this approach of aiding and abetting only if, in addition to
2 knowing of the criminal activity, she actually took actions
3 intended to help it succeed. An aider and abettor must know
4 that the crime is being committed and act in a way that is
5 intended to bring about the success of a criminal venture.
6 To determine whether Ms. Maxwell aided or abetted the
7 commission of the crime with which she is charged, ask yourself
8 these questions:
9 One. Did the defendant participate in the crime
10 charged as something she wished to bring about?
11 Two. Did the defendant knowingly and willfully
12 associate herself with the criminal venture?
13 Three. Did the defendant seek by her actions to make
14 the criminal venture succeed?
15 If she did, then Ms. Maxwell is an aider and abettor
16 and, therefore, guilty of the offense. If, on the other hand,
17 your answer to any of these questions is no, then Ms. Maxwell
18 is not an aider and abettor, and you must find her not guilty
19 under that theory.
20 Instruction No. 31. Counts One, Three, and Five.
21 Conspiracy to violate federal laws. Conspiracy and substantive
22 counts.
23 Counts One, Three, and Five of the indictment each
24 charge Ms. Maxwell with participating in a "conspiracy." The
25 statute for Counts One, Three, and Five is Title 18, United
SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.
(212) 805-0300
DOJ-OGR-00014611

Discussion 0

Sign in to join the discussion

No comments yet

Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document