DOJ-OGR-00014845.jpg
571 KB
Extraction Summary
5
People
2
Organizations
1
Locations
1
Events
3
Relationships
3
Quotes
Document Information
Type:
Legal document
File Size:
571 KB
Summary
This document is a court transcript from August 22, 2022, detailing a conversation between the judge (THE COURT) and an attorney, Ms. Sternheim, regarding her client Ms. Maxwell's sentence. Ms. Sternheim argues that Ms. Maxwell cannot pay a fine because a bequest she was to receive is 'unactualized,' but the Court counters that other assets exist and proceeds to formally impose the sentence.
People (5)
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| MS. MOE | Attorney |
Speaker in the court transcript, responding to the judge.
|
| MS. STERNHEIM | Attorney |
Speaker in the court transcript, making a statement on behalf of Ms. Maxwell regarding her ability to pay a fine.
|
| Ms. Maxwell | Defendant |
The subject of the sentencing hearing. Her ability to pay a fine based on a bequest is being discussed. The Court add...
|
| Your Honor | Judge |
Addressed by Ms. Moe and Ms. Sternheim. This is the presiding judge in the case.
|
| Judge | Judge |
Addressed by Ms. Sternheim. This is the presiding judge in the case.
|
Organizations (2)
| Name | Type | Context |
|---|---|---|
| THE COURT | government agency |
Refers to the judicial body and the presiding judge who is speaking and making rulings.
|
| SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C. | company |
Listed at the bottom of the transcript as the court reporting service.
|
Timeline (1 events)
2022-08-22
A portion of a sentencing hearing where the defendant's ability to pay a fine is discussed, followed by the formal imposition of the sentence by the judge.
Courtroom in the Southern District
Locations (1)
| Location | Context |
|---|---|
|
Implied by the name of the court reporting company, "SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C."
|
Relationships (3)
Ms. Sternheim is acting as legal counsel for Ms. Maxwell, making arguments on her behalf during sentencing.
The Court is the judicial authority imposing a sentence upon Ms. Maxwell, the defendant.
The two parties are engaged in a formal legal dialogue in a courtroom setting, with Ms. Sternheim representing her client before the judge.
Key Quotes (3)
"I just want the record to reflect that that is an unactualized bequest, as Ms. Maxwell has received nothing, and it is the expectation that she will receive nothing."Source
— MS. STERNHEIM
(Arguing to the court that Ms. Maxwell lacks the funds from a specific bequest to pay a fine.)
DOJ-OGR-00014845.jpg
Quote #1
"I am not finding and accept that she hasn't received anything, but there have only been nonspecific claims that she won't receive anything and there are additional assets that lead me to the conclusion that she is able to pay the fine."Source
— THE COURT
(Responding to Ms. Sternheim's argument and justifying the decision to impose the fine.)
DOJ-OGR-00014845.jpg
Quote #2
"The sentence as stated is imposed."Source
— THE COURT
(The formal ruling by the judge, concluding the discussion and enacting the sentence.)
DOJ-OGR-00014845.jpg
Quote #3
Full Extracted Text
Complete text extracted from the document (1,905 characters)
Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 779 Filed 08/22/22 Page 98 of 101
M6s2Max2
M6s2Max2
1 MS. MOE: No, your Honor.
2 MS. STERNHEIM: Your Honor, I would just like to make
3 one statement, if I may. With regard to the fine, the Court
4 indicated the bequest in the will. I just want the record to
5 reflect that that is an unactualized bequest, as Ms. Maxwell
6 has received nothing, and it is the expectation that she will
7 receive nothing.
8 THE COURT: I understand. And to be clear, I am not
9 finding and accept that she hasn't received anything, but there
10 have only been nonspecific claims that she won't receive
11 anything and there are additional assets that lead me to the
12 conclusion that she is able to pay the fine.
13 MS. STERNHEIM: Thank you, Judge.
14 THE COURT: Thank you.
15 And just to confirm, Ms. Sternheim, any legal reason
16 why the sentence should not be imposed as stated other than
17 what already was argued?
18 MS. STERNHEIM: No, your Honor, but I do have requests
19 for recommendation.
20 THE COURT: I will get there. Thank you.
21 The sentence as stated is imposed. I do find the
22 sentence is sufficient but not greater than necessary to
23 satisfy the sentencing purposes that I described earlier.
24 Ms. Maxwell, when you are released and on supervised
25 release, you will have the guidance and support of the
2 MS. STERNHEIM: Your Honor, I would just like to make
3 one statement, if I may. With regard to the fine, the Court
4 indicated the bequest in the will. I just want the record to
5 reflect that that is an unactualized bequest, as Ms. Maxwell
6 has received nothing, and it is the expectation that she will
7 receive nothing.
8 THE COURT: I understand. And to be clear, I am not
9 finding and accept that she hasn't received anything, but there
10 have only been nonspecific claims that she won't receive
11 anything and there are additional assets that lead me to the
12 conclusion that she is able to pay the fine.
13 MS. STERNHEIM: Thank you, Judge.
14 THE COURT: Thank you.
15 And just to confirm, Ms. Sternheim, any legal reason
16 why the sentence should not be imposed as stated other than
17 what already was argued?
18 MS. STERNHEIM: No, your Honor, but I do have requests
19 for recommendation.
20 THE COURT: I will get there. Thank you.
21 The sentence as stated is imposed. I do find the
22 sentence is sufficient but not greater than necessary to
23 satisfy the sentencing purposes that I described earlier.
24 Ms. Maxwell, when you are released and on supervised
25 release, you will have the guidance and support of the
SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.
.
.
.
(212) 805-0300
.
.
.
(212) 805-0300
DOJ-OGR-00014845
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document