Note - DOJ-OGR-00020864 | Trove Document Archive

Processing Document...

0%

Initializing...

Extraction Summary

3

People

1

Organizations

1

Locations

2

Events

2

Relationships

1

Quotes

Document Information

Type: Note

File Size: 333 KB

Summary

This document is a handwritten note dated December 27, 2021, from an unknown individual (likely a juror) to Judge Nathan during the 'US v. Maxwell' trial. The author seeks clarification on Count Four, asking if the defendant can be found guilty for aiding in the transportation of a victim named 'Jane' to New Mexico if the intent to engage in sexual activity was on Jane's part, not the defendant's. The note highlights a point of confusion regarding the legal elements required for a conviction on that specific charge.

People (3)

Name	Role	Context
Judge Nathan	Judge	The note is addressed to "Hello Judge Nathan,".
Maxwell	Defendant	Mentioned in the case name "US v. Maxwell" and referred to as "the defendant" in the note's question.
Jane	Victim/Witness	Mentioned as the person whose flight was aided by the defendant: "transportation of Jane's return flight".

Organizations (1)

Name	Type	Context
US	Government	Mentioned in the case name "US v. Maxwell".

Timeline (2 events)

2021-12-27

The ongoing trial of US v. Maxwell, case number 20 CR 330 (AJN), during which this note was written.

Maxwell Judge Nathan

View

Jane's return flight to New Mexico, which the defendant allegedly aided.

New Mexico

Jane Maxwell

View

Locations (1)

Location	Context
New Mexico	Mentioned as the destination of a flight: "the flight to New Mexico".

Relationships (2)

Maxwell → Defendant-Victim/Witness → Jane

The note discusses the defendant (Maxwell) aiding in the transportation of Jane, which is central to a criminal charge (Count Four).

Unknown author → Juror-Judge (inferred) → Judge Nathan

The author addresses the judge directly with a specific legal question about jury instructions for a specific count in an ongoing trial, which is characteristic of a juror's note to a judge.

Key Quotes (1)

"Under Count Four (4), If the defendant aided in the transportation of Jane's return flight, but not the flight to New Mexico Where/if the intent was for Jane to engage in sexual activity, can she be found guilty under the second element?"

Source

— Unknown author of the note (A question posed to Judge Nathan seeking clarification on the conditions for a guilty verdict under Count Four.)

DOJ-OGR-00020864.jpg

Quote #1

Full Extracted Text

Complete text extracted from the document (507 characters)

Case 22-1426, Document 58, 02/28/2023, 3475901, Page38 of 221
A-238
Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN Document 593 Filed 02/04/22 Page 23 of 30
COURT EXHIBIT
DATE: 12/27/2021
TIME:
CASE: US v. Maxwell
20 CR 330 (AJN)

Hello Judge Nathan,

Under Count Four (4), If the defendant aided in the transportation of Jane's return flight, but not the flight to New Mexico

Where/if the intent was for Jane to engage in sexual activity, can she be found guilty under the second element?

Thank [REDACTED]
#26

DOJ-OGR-00020864

View Original PDF