DOJ-OGR-00019415.jpg
446 KB
Extraction Summary
3
People
3
Organizations
1
Locations
2
Events
2
Relationships
1
Quotes
Document Information
Type:
Legal document
File Size:
446 KB
Summary
This legal document, dated September 24, 2020, is a filing in an appeal related to the case 'Giuffre v. Maxwell'. The author argues that appealing Judge Preska's decision to unseal deposition material will be moot after a final judgment. The stated purpose of the appeal is to share redacted information, which Ms. Maxwell learned, with Judge Preska.
People (3)
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Ms. Maxwell | Defendant |
Mentioned as the subject of the government's criminal allegations and a party in the case Giuffre v. Maxwell.
|
| Judge Preska | Judge |
Mentioned as the judge whose decision to unseal deposition material is being appealed.
|
| Giuffre | Plaintiff |
Mentioned as the plaintiff in the case Giuffre v. Maxwell.
|
Organizations (3)
| Name | Type | Context |
|---|---|---|
| government | government agency |
Referenced in the phrase "the government’s criminal allegations against Ms. Maxwell".
|
| 2d Cir. | Court |
The United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit, identified by the case number Nos. 20-2413.
|
| S.D.N.Y. | Court |
The United States District Court for the Southern District of New York, identified by the case number 15-cv-7433.
|
Timeline (2 events)
2020-09-24
Judge Preska's decision unsealing the deposition material in Giuffre v. Maxwell.
S.D.N.Y.
Locations (1)
| Location | Context |
|---|---|
|
The Southern District of New York, where the case 15-cv-7433 was filed.
|
Relationships (2)
They are opposing parties in the lawsuit 'Giuffre v. Maxwell'.
The document discusses Judge Preska's ruling which affects Ms. Maxwell, and the appeal's purpose is to share information with the judge.
Key Quotes (1)
"That is the very point of this appeal, after all: to share with Judge Preska what Ms. Maxwell learned from [REDACTED]"Source
— Author of the document (representing Ms. Maxwell)
(Stating the primary purpose for the legal appeal being discussed.)
DOJ-OGR-00019415.jpg
Quote #1
Full Extracted Text
Complete text extracted from the document (790 characters)
Case 20-3061, Document 60, 09/24/2020, 2938278, Page16 of 58
order, App. 99–103; the propriety of modifying the protective order is completely
separate from the merits of the government’s criminal allegations against Ms.
Maxwell; and appellate review of the order will be impossible following final
judgment because a post-judgment appeal will be moot since, by that time, Judge
Preska’s decision unsealing the deposition material in Giuffre v. Maxwell, Nos. 20-
2413 (2d Cir.)/15-cv-7433 (S.D.N.Y.) will have gone into effect.
separate from the merits of the government’s criminal allegations against Ms.
Maxwell; and appellate review of the order will be impossible following final
judgment because a post-judgment appeal will be moot since, by that time, Judge
Preska’s decision unsealing the deposition material in Giuffre v. Maxwell, Nos. 20-
2413 (2d Cir.)/15-cv-7433 (S.D.N.Y.) will have gone into effect.
That is the very point of this appeal, after all: to share with Judge Preska
what Ms. Maxwell learned from [REDACTED]
[REDACTED]
[REDACTED]
[REDACTED]
[REDACTED]
[REDACTED]
[REDACTED]
[REDACTED] What’s more, all of this happened while the
what Ms. Maxwell learned from [REDACTED]
[REDACTED]
[REDACTED]
[REDACTED]
[REDACTED]
[REDACTED]
[REDACTED]
[REDACTED] What’s more, all of this happened while the
11
DOJ-OGR-00019415
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document