DOJ-OGR-00014473.jpg
641 KB
Extraction Summary
7
People
2
Organizations
2
Locations
4
Events
2
Relationships
2
Quotes
Document Information
Type:
Legal document
File Size:
641 KB
Summary
This document is a transcript of a legal summation by Ms. Moe in the trial of a defendant named Maxwell. Ms. Moe refutes the defense's arguments regarding Maxwell's London residence and counters the claim that four key witnesses (Jane, Kate, Carolyn, and Annie) are lying for financial gain. She asserts the witnesses have no financial stake in the current trial's outcome, as their civil suits are concluded and they have already received compensation from the Jeffrey Epstein Victim Compensation Program.
People (7)
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Ms. Moe | Speaker (likely prosecutor) |
Mentioned in the header as the person giving the summation.
|
| Maxwell | Defendant |
The subject of the summation, referred to as the defendant. Her residence and testimony are discussed.
|
| Kate | Witness |
Mentioned as having met Maxwell in 1994 and as one of four women the defense claims is lying.
|
| Jane | Witness |
Mentioned as one of four women the defense claims is lying.
|
| Carolyn | Witness |
Mentioned as one of four women the defense claims is lying.
|
| Annie | Witness |
Mentioned as one of four women the defense claims is lying.
|
| Jeffrey Epstein |
Mentioned as the namesake of the Victim Compensation Program.
|
Organizations (2)
| Name | Type | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Jeffrey Epstein Victim Compensation Program | program |
A program to which four female witnesses submitted claims and were awarded millions of dollars.
|
| SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C. | company |
Listed at the bottom of the page, likely the court reporting agency that transcribed the proceedings.
|
Timeline (4 events)
Locations (2)
| Location | Context |
|---|---|
|
The city where Maxwell's property records and houses are located.
|
|
|
An address in London where Maxwell testified she had lived since 1992 or 1993, and where the defense claims she did n...
|
Key Quotes (2)
"Maxwell herself testified under oath in a 2019 deposition, here it is, that she had lived at 44 Kinnerton Street since 1992 or 1993."Source
— Ms. Moe
(Used to counter the defense's claim that Maxwell did not live at that address in 1994.)
DOJ-OGR-00014473.jpg
Quote #1
"Their civil lawsuits are over. Those cases are done and the witnesses don't get anything out of testifying at this trial. They were clear in their testimony. They have no financial stake in the outcome of this trial. None."Source
— Ms. Moe
(Arguing against the defense's claim that the witnesses are lying for money.)
DOJ-OGR-00014473.jpg
Quote #2
Full Extracted Text
Complete text extracted from the document (1,690 characters)
Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 767 Filed 08/10/22 Page 73 of 257
LCKVMAX4 Summation - Ms. Moe 2906
LCKVMAX4 Summation - Ms. Moe 2906
1 Finally, I also expect the defense will make arguments
2 to you about property records in London. Those all came in by
3 stipulation on Friday. They'll say that Maxwell didn't live at
4 44 Kinnerton Street in 1994, when Kate met her; and that she
5 lived -- that Maxwell lived in another house nearby in London.
6 But that's just another distraction and here's why:
7 Maxwell herself testified under oath in a 2019
8 deposition, here it is, that she had lived at 44 Kinnerton
9 Street since 1992 or 1993. So either the defendant lived there
10 the whole time or she mixed up her two London houses and Kate
11 did too. Either way, it just doesn't matter.
12 So next, the defense has argued to you that Jane and
13 Kate and Carolyn and Annie are all lying. The defense has
14 asked you to believe that Jane and Kate and Annie and Carolyn,
15 that they are all lying for money. But none of that makes any
16 sense when you look at it closely. It doesn't make any sense
17 when you look at the evidence.
18 Now, all four women have testified that they submitted
19 claims to the Jeffrey Epstein Victim Compensation Program.
20 They were awarded millions of dollars. And that happened well
21 before this trial. Their civil lawsuits are over. Those cases
22 are done and the witnesses don't get anything out of testifying
23 at this trial. They were clear in their testimony. They have
24 no financial stake in the outcome of this trial. None.
25 And one of the other ways you know the witnesses
2 to you about property records in London. Those all came in by
3 stipulation on Friday. They'll say that Maxwell didn't live at
4 44 Kinnerton Street in 1994, when Kate met her; and that she
5 lived -- that Maxwell lived in another house nearby in London.
6 But that's just another distraction and here's why:
7 Maxwell herself testified under oath in a 2019
8 deposition, here it is, that she had lived at 44 Kinnerton
9 Street since 1992 or 1993. So either the defendant lived there
10 the whole time or she mixed up her two London houses and Kate
11 did too. Either way, it just doesn't matter.
12 So next, the defense has argued to you that Jane and
13 Kate and Carolyn and Annie are all lying. The defense has
14 asked you to believe that Jane and Kate and Annie and Carolyn,
15 that they are all lying for money. But none of that makes any
16 sense when you look at it closely. It doesn't make any sense
17 when you look at the evidence.
18 Now, all four women have testified that they submitted
19 claims to the Jeffrey Epstein Victim Compensation Program.
20 They were awarded millions of dollars. And that happened well
21 before this trial. Their civil lawsuits are over. Those cases
22 are done and the witnesses don't get anything out of testifying
23 at this trial. They were clear in their testimony. They have
24 no financial stake in the outcome of this trial. None.
25 And one of the other ways you know the witnesses
SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.
(212) 805-0300
(212) 805-0300
DOJ-OGR-00014473
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document