This document is a page from a legal filing (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE, United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell) citing the legal precedent of *Commonwealth v. Cosby*. The text details the court's reasoning for admitting 'prior bad acts' evidence (Rule 404(b)) and deposition testimony regarding Quaaludes in the Bill Cosby trial to prove intent and motive. It concludes with a summary of Cosby's conviction for aggravated indecent assault and his designation as a 'sexually violent predator' under SORNA.
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Bill Cosby | Defendant (in cited case) |
Subject of the legal analysis regarding admissibility of evidence, conviction, and sentencing.
|
| Ms. Constand | Victim (in cited case) |
Victim of aggravated indecent assault; court discussed her delayed reporting.
|
| Name | Type | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Commonwealth |
Prosecution authority (Pennsylvania) in the Cosby case.
|
|
| DOJ |
Department of Justice (implied by footer DOJ-OGR).
|
| Location | Context |
|---|---|
|
Implied jurisdiction based on Pa.C.S. citation.
|
"Ms. Constand did not report the assault until approximately one year later, further supporting the Commonwealth’s need for the evidence."Source
"Cosby’s “own words about his use and knowledge of drugs with a depressant effect was relevant to show his intent and motive in giving a depressant to [] Constand.”"Source
"Cosby “either knew [Constand] was unconscious, or recklessly disregarded the risk that she could be.”"Source
"the trial court deemed Cosby to be a “sexually violent predator” pursuant to the then-applicable version of the Sex Offender Registration and Notification Act (“SORNA”)"Source
Complete text extracted from the document (2,227 characters)
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document